Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Jeff Cooper
Stats
Member since
04-24-2011
78
Posts
10
Helpful
0
Solutions
08-08-2014
06:29 AM
we do it with ASAs.. setup normal sslvpn with anyconnect.. then setup a specific user account for the phone.. create a second group-policy for phones, copying the original sslvpn group-policy.. but in this "phone" policy, you'll make sure to tunnel all... finally, under the user attributes for the phone credentials on the ASA, assign the second group-policy.. then you need to go into the spa525g2 and enable sccp, and enable alternate TFTP.. putting in the address of your UC500 so phone can register to it once on vpn.. just enter web address in 525g2 (https://x.x.x.x:1234/ of whatnot), username and password.. slide to vpn enable and it'll try to connect.. then slide to enable on boot up.. don't know if this will help - never messed with anything regarding sslvpn directly with the UC500 myself..
... View more
Created by
Jeff Cooper
in Voice Systems
in Voice Systems
08-08-2014
06:18 AM
08-08-2014
06:18 AM
Hello, have a uc540 running 8.62. Have an extension when it's in use, doesn't light the blf on other users phones. IE ext 110 picks up the phone and is in a call. Rest of users on system with a watch mapped to the ext 110 DN, don't see the ext 110 blf light. Client says this happens randomly for all users, but for now, consistent on this extension. No presence etc setup. Used CCA to configure box. No user can see when ext110 is in use - no BLF lights up for anyone "watch"ing ext 110.
all spa500 phones, sccp - nothing fancy
Suggestions? This is a new one for me.
Thanks
... View more
Labels:
12-12-2013
09:25 PM
sorry, i keep hoping that like the last revs for the pix506 series (v633-635?), where the ios upgrade converted the ports from 10mb limitations to 10/100, that the same might come out for the asa5505 with gb... but the truth is, the max it'll ever push is limited by its thruput.. it's a dead duck that can't be sold, but the one first run ASA they haven't EOL'd..
... View more
12-12-2013
09:21 PM
it's wonderful how cisco does that - shoot themselves in the foot - ie, killing off the uc500 series before the SMB 6000 is even released, meantime another vendor is gaining ground thru all our clients... ie no replacement for the 5505 with it's now weak thru put... meantime another vendor is gaining ground thru all our clients.. cisco has a bad habit of killing a good thing or delaying replacement when a good thing is no longer feasible in the market place.. unfortunately, in most the business environments of clients later part of this year, a 5505 is now a lead boot and being replaced.. just can't keep up with the demands of internet.. folks not interested in paying $3000-4000 when you can easily find a firewall WITH web filtering, load balancing for half the price, not to mention more thruput then the 5512.. same with switches, you can easily find switches half the price of cisco switches with LIFE time warranties.. in fact, of our 1000+ clients, there's really no cisco switches left, all have been replaced by another vendor.. dont get me wrong as we go round with our cisco account manager, but what do they know.. they only preach the slide shows upper management shows them and have no power to act on behalf of their SMB accounts in reality.. they're spoon fed from the top i've been cisco red white and blue for over 10 years.. but it's getting very hard to continue representing them myself in the marketplace.. the uc500 now the ASA series is just more nails in the coffin.. sad times
... View more
12-03-2013
10:01 AM
Client interested in purchasing the wireless conference phone - cp-8831 - for use with a uc560 8.6(2)... that possible? not seeing it in the type list, but perhaps there's an equivalent that can "fake it" thx
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Jeff Cooper
in Network Security
in Network Security
11-26-2013
04:33 PM
11-26-2013
04:33 PM
yeah have him check for updates and let me know.. i'd like to know if it's a win update or whatnot.. that's kind of what we were running into.. admin accounts in general seemed to work ok.. but then if you changed a user to an admin group, it was like the LDAP lookup didnt see the change and they still didnt work.. on the other hand, was like some long long established account would work, but newly created accounts wouldn't work.. yeah, really messed with the head so i was pleasantly surprised it just up and worked this weekend..
... View more
Created by
Jeff Cooper
in Network Security
in Network Security
11-26-2013
03:57 PM
11-26-2013
03:57 PM
I had to look back as to when I posted this. We upgraded to 9.0, etc and currently are running 9.13-2. In the spring we went thru a massive cutover of clients to sslvpn instead of open RDP. We ran into this about 1/3rd of the places. We opened a TAC case and they found when running LDAP browser, attributes were NOT showing up in AD queries. We opened a Microsoft case and they did not like the LDAP browser cisco was using and used their own. Using their own, they showed the group attributes were showing up. Personally, I've known Microsoft to be a pain in their support calls. LDAP is LDAP as far as a group attribute query. Anyway, I digress. Microsoft said it was fine and cisco consistently showed thru various browsers that it wasn't working with AD. But interesting you asked if i had resolved it. I've not messed with it since spring, and then I decided to test again this past weekend (6+ months since the issue).. And i'll be darn if it didnt work everywhere i was having issues. Best I can say is it's either the 9.13-2 version we're running or a MS update that occurred in the last 6 months. We've ran 9.0x and 9.12 way back when testing and upgrading client ASAs - problem still existed. We put on 9.13-2 maybe 30 days ago? I know this isn't a definitive answer, but perhaps there's MS updates you're missing, or perhaps the issue was on Cisco's side, whereas 9.13-2 has resolved the mysterious issue.
... View more
11-05-2013
03:23 AM
thank you sir.. thank you for the great help you've provided during the life of this wonderful system.. was a fun run
... View more
10-31-2013
06:37 AM
Every client has a unique request/comment. My current client thinks the uc560 works too well. It's 8.6.2 When the client transfers a call and the caller is dumped to the new receipient, the client thinks it's "too clean", "too perfect". Is there a tone that can be generated when the call is handed off? The concern is that the new receipient doesn't know the transfering person has handed off the call because there's no click etc. Can a tone be generated for that so the receipient knows the transfer process has been completed and they are now talking to the caller? thanks!
... View more
Labels:
10-10-2013
01:10 PM
I've a uc560 with direct dial intercoms setup. 8.6.2. Clients often complain that the intercom is too stealthy. It just comes on and it could be used during a sensitive conversation. Is there a way to add a "tone" to the intercom? thanks /
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Jeff Cooper
in Voice Systems
in Voice Systems
10-10-2013
01:07 PM
10-10-2013
01:07 PM
both ways worked great thank you!
... View more
Created by
Jeff Cooper
in Voice Systems
in Voice Systems
09-18-2013
11:19 AM
09-18-2013
11:19 AM
didn't work but again - fxs port as it's not compatible with fxo port .. (below readout).. trying connection plar 101.. maybe that'll work KMK-UC540(config-voiceport)#do show voice port sum IN OUT PORT CH SIG-TYPE ADMIN OPER STATUS STATUS EC =============== == ============ ===== ==== ======== ======== == 0/0/0 -- fxs-ls up dorm on-hook idle y KMK-UC540(config-voiceport)#voice-port 0/0/0 KMK-UC540(config-voiceport)#intercom 101 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. KMK-UC540(config-voiceport)#int ? % Unrecognized command KMK-UC540(config-voiceport)#
... View more
Created by
Jeff Cooper
in Voice Systems
in Voice Systems
09-18-2013
11:01 AM
09-18-2013
11:01 AM
to verify per my question, i can use in the intercom command above as any extension on the phone system without any intercom related configuration on the target extensions so as above : intercom 101 will ring the call-blast group ? thanks
... View more
Created by
Jeff Cooper
in Voice Systems
in Voice Systems
09-18-2013
10:57 AM
09-18-2013
10:57 AM
Hello. UC540 862. I have a door intercom i have patched into the phone system via FXS port (will not use FXO). When the button is pressed on the door intercom, you get a dial tone over the speaker and the FXS port is open. Is there a method to have it auto-dial an extension? I've setup lobby phones that intercom a specific phone internally, but in this case, i need it to autodial a main hunt group- ext 101, which blasts 4 people. Unfortunately the door unit does not have a dial-pad. Thanks in advance.
... View more
Labels:
08-08-2014
we do it with ASAs.. setup normal sslvpn with anyconnect.. then setup a
specific user account for th...
08-08-2014
Hello, have a uc540 running 8.62. Have an extension when it's in use,
doesn't light the blf on other...
12-12-2013
sorry, i keep hoping that like the last revs for the pix506 series
(v633-635?), where the ios upgrad...
12-12-2013
it's wonderful how cisco does that - shoot themselves in the foot - ie,
killing off the uc500 series...
12-03-2013
Client interested in purchasing the wireless conference phone - cp-8831
- for use with a uc560 8.6(2...
Created by
Jeff Cooper
in Network Security
11-26-2013
11-26-2013
yeah have him check for updates and let me know.. i'd like to know if
it's a win update or whatnot.....
Created by
Jeff Cooper
in Network Security
11-26-2013
11-26-2013
I had to look back as to when I posted this. We upgraded to 9.0, etc and
currently are running 9.13-...
11-05-2013
thank you sir.. thank you for the great help you've provided during the
life of this wonderful syste...
10-31-2013
Every client has a unique request/comment. My current client thinks the
uc560 works too well. It's 8...
10-10-2013
I've a uc560 with direct dial intercoms setup. 8.6.2. Clients often
complain that the intercom is to...
09-18-2013
didn't work but again - fxs port as it's not compatible with fxo port ..
(below readout).. trying co...
09-18-2013
to verify per my question, i can use in the intercom command above as
any extension on the phone sys...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 04-24-2011 08:42 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 09-14-2018 06:46 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 78 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 10 |
