Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
hi, there,we have many interfaces on our access layer switches, each of them are connected with two devices, a phone and a computer, how ever, we found each of the interfaces with many mac addresses, some of them even with hundreds. The devices are n...
hi,I was reading CCIE R&S by Wendoll Odom about BGP Nexthop, see the diagram. It first gives a problem in this scenario, "R4's route to 30.0.0.0/8 through R2 lists R1 IP(1.1.1.1)....Unfortunately, R4 doesn't have a route for 1.1.1.1 on R1, so that ro...
thank you first.4 routers:R3--R1--S1--S3R3 and R1 are in Area 3;R1 and S1 are in Area 0;S1 and S2 are in Eigrp;redistribute S3 Lo0 into A0.When show ip ospf data on any of these three routers that run ospf, there is only type 5, no tpye 4.why?
Hi,I configured netflow a router 1841, which have two Ethernet interfaces in work. on the interface FE0/1, I enabled netflow, on FE0, i didnt. but when I use my application to look the traffic, it shows the traffic on FE0/0. why?thanks,Haninterface F...
Hi, guys:I am just wondering whether there is a script that i can do a repeat work.For instance, if I try to find any switch within 200 switches that with VTP mode="server" or vtp domain name <> ABC? Can this "script" just list them?thanks,Han
Amjad,The only happened with specific type of phone connected, as far as i know. and from our ISE, I see a lot of Unknown mac-address, starting with Cray communicatins. Besides the TCam is running out of Mask part sometimes, i suspect, it is a resul...
Here is a example of the show mac- results. on port g6/32, there are 4 mac addresses, all of them are actually phantom macs. they dont have any entry in the arp table. the mac addresses are from Cray Communications and i suppect it has somethinng to ...
Giuseppe thanks first.My understanding is that:as long as R1 advertizes 1.1.1.0/30 to R2. R2 would pass it to all routers in its AS, right?So, I'd think your condition wouldnt exist. "if IP subnet 1.1.1.0/30 is not advertised in iBGP or in an IGP R3 ...
