Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi everyone,I have some sort of strange problem.In my network I run a Port-channel between a Cisco 7513 and a Catalyst 2950-24. The Port-channel is a trunk link with dot1q encapsulation. Whenever I change the configuration of the Port-channel interfa...
This link will tell you pretty much everything, I only have a few suggestions -- use the aux line, not the con line, as con doesn't support hardware flow control on most routers and also is very liberal when it comes to security- try 'modem autoconfi...
Hi Andy,In my opinion, both ideas have pros and cons. I will try to list all the important ones that come to my mind right now (yet I might miss some things).Solution 1:+ Less cables between racks (obviously)+ No single point of failure (if one of th...
Thanks for the tips, I think there is some pertinent information within them. I will look into the matter in a couple of days or so because right now I don't have the time to do it. Anyway, I'll keep you posted with the results when I'll do the testi...
I didn't touch the 2950's spanning tree configuration except enabling portfast on the ports I knew won't connect to another switches. But, do you think that this could impact on the Port-channel behaviour?Yes I too suspect the software on the 7500 cr...
Yes I would want that the native VLAN for the trunk to be VLAN 1, as it's not used for any specific traffic, even the management VLAN is another one. However, I was under the impression that this is the default setting; when I tried to set it on the ...
