Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About epicolo
08-15-2018
Stats
Member since
01-26-2006
218
Posts
33
Helpful
6
Solutions
Created by
epicolo
in Cisco Bug Discussions
in Cisco Bug Discussions
06-08-2017
06:35 AM
06-08-2017
06:35 AM
The advisory list MXPs as vulnerable, but I couldn´t find any other info regarding MXP (that runs F software)
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20170607-tele
TelePresence System Profile MXP Series: TelePresence System Profile 52-inch MXP TelePresence System Profile MXP Model
Thanks
... View more
Labels:
04-18-2016
12:58 PM
Well, I opened a Cisco SR at TAC and the engineer said that it is not possible to use the RV110W behind NAT because it do not Support NAT-Traversal. She suggested to try to configure the DSL Modem in bridge mode to have the public IP direclty at WAN interface and send the feedback to the case.
After this, I did some more tests and log verifications and after to configure the RV110W with fixed fixed IP (local address for DSL modem. eg: 192.168.1.10) and put this IP as RemoteID at RV130W side, the tunnel was up. No other configuration at DSL was needed. The only concern is that the Public IP used by the DSL connection must be know, to configure at RV130W side (The RV130W do not work fine if we point to FQDN and RV110W configure its WAN (local IP in my case) to a Dynamic DNS.
It is now working fine.
... View more
04-16-2016
04:48 PM
After a lot of tests, this is what we got at RV130 log:
1 2016-04-17 12:45:56 AM warning pluto[7648]: "VPN_from_RV110W": deleting connection 2 2016-04-17 12:45:55 AM warning pluto[7648]: "VPN_from_RV110W" #3: deleting state (STATE_MAIN_I1) 3 2016-04-17 12:45:55 AM warning pluto[7648]: "VPN_from_RV110W": terminating SAs using this connection 4 2016-04-17 12:45:52 AM warning pluto[7648]: "VPN_from_RV110W" #3: initiating Main Mode 5 2016-04-17 12:45:50 AM warning pluto[7648]: added connection description "VPN_from_RV110W" 6 2016-04-17 12:45:49 AM warning pluto[7648]: "VPN_from_RV110W": deleting connection 7 2016-04-17 12:45:48 AM warning pluto[7648]: packet from X.X.X.X: initial Main Mode message received on A.B.C.D:500 but no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK 8 2016-04-17 12:45:48 AM warning pluto[7648]: packet from X.X.X.X: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection] 9 2016-04-17 12:45:48 AM warning pluto[7648]: packet from X.X.X.X:41: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [4f457e717f6b5a4e727d576b] 10 2016-04-17 12:45:48 AM warning pluto[7648]: "VPN_from_RV110W" #2: deleting state (STATE_MAIN_I1) 11 2016-04-17 12:45:48 AM warning pluto[7648]: "VPN_from_RV110W": terminating SAs using this connection 12 2016-04-17 12:45:45 AM warning pluto[7648]: "VPN_from_RV110W" #2: initiating Main Mode 13 2016-04-17 12:45:43 AM warning pluto[7648]: added connection description "VPN_from_RV110W"
Any ideas?
... View more
Created by
epicolo
in Small Business Routers
in Small Business Routers
04-16-2016
01:56 PM
04-16-2016
01:56 PM
Hi, we are trying to configure a VPN IPSEC (site-to-site) between RV110W and RV130W. They both are running the latest FW version.
The RV130W have fixed public IP (the concetrator)
The RV110W MUST work behind NAT (it will be connected to a standard DSL/cable modem) and have DHCP client at WAN interface.
*It is using DDNS.
We had some unsuccessful tests, always indicating "IPSec SA Not Established" at RV110W and not_connected at RV130W side.
Any tip regarding what to configure at RV130W as Remote Identifier (since the RV110W is using dynamic IP at WAN interface)?
Thanks
... View more
Labels:
04-01-2016
05:29 AM
where you able to establish the VPN from RV110W to ASA? Are they compatible?
I´m planning to install a RV110W in a branch and it will connect to internet using local IP (behind dynamic NAT) and was wondering if this model can support this scenario?
(I saw at the admin guide a field that request WAN public IP at RV110w side, but it is dynamic)
Thanks
... View more
04-01-2016
05:25 AM
Where you able to configure this scenario? Can the RV110w establish the VPN tunnel behind dynamic NAT? thanks
... View more
03-28-2016
01:45 PM
Hi guys,
do you know an alternative to send all flow/traffic from a Jabber for Windows 11.1 through a Proxy without to use a VPN?
The Expressway Edge have its public IP and the MRA configured. Everything fine from internet, but a specific country do not allow direct connections to internet. All internet traffic flow through Proxy.
Any ideas?
Thanks
... View more
Created by
epicolo
in Other Collaboration Subjects
in Other Collaboration Subjects
05-15-2015
06:46 AM
05-15-2015
06:46 AM
Hi guys, lets imagine a scenario: Central CUCM 10.5 with ILS configured. No registered devices CUCM A with IM&P, Core and Edge with domaina.com CUCM B with IM&P, Core and Edge with domainb.com Central CUCM can comunicate with both CUCM A and CUCM B and there are routes btw them. A Jabber UC register from internet via EdgeA in domaina.com (CUCM A) A Jabber UC register from internet via EdgeB in domainb.com (CUCM B) A call btw Jabber UC A and Jabber UC B will be external (using RMS)? or due to the ILS this will be an "internal" call and the flow will go through the CoreA and CoreB? IF Internal: Signaling: Jabber UC A > Edge A > Core A > CUCM A > Central CUCM > CUCM B > Core B > Edge B - Jabber UC B Video Path: Jabber UC A > Edge A > Core A > Core B > Edge B > Jabber UC B *Reminding that there are routes btw CoreA and CoreB as well as btw CUCM A and CUCM B Is this correct? What about IM&P? I assume that thuy will need to be federated. Any ideas will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
... View more
Labels:
Created by
epicolo
in IP Telephony and Phones
in IP Telephony and Phones
01-14-2015
07:17 AM
01-14-2015
07:17 AM
In our tests the CTL file was automatically created due to a CSF device creation using Security Profile with TLS+Encryption. The questions: Can we choose if/when to generate the CTL file for a Device? If I manually delete a CTL file from the TFTP, is it possible to regenerate it for a specific device? If a Jabber for windows already have its CTL FIle and configuration file downloaded locally, it will need to download it again or it can be cached and used? *The idea here is to control Jabber registrations from outside, using MRA. To find a way to force the user to register internally first and will only be able to log trough MRA if it already have the CTL and config file. Thanks Regards
... View more
Labels:
04-10-2014
06:16 AM
Hi Alex, could you describe your scenario in more details? Did you used a C40 with TC7.1 ? Which features did you tested? It is a profile or are you using a regular TV? Thanks Elter
... View more
Created by
epicolo
in Collaboration, Voice and Video Documents
in Collaboration, Voice and Video Documents
02-25-2014
06:07 AM
02-25-2014
06:07 AM
Which argument/line will enable the Remote and Mobile Access in version 9.6? Thanks
... View more
Created by
epicolo
in Other Collaboration Subjects
in Other Collaboration Subjects
12-13-2013
06:39 AM
12-13-2013
06:39 AM
Hi guys, i would like to confirm if a MXA server (SNSC220-WKG-K9) can support both a SnS 5.3.12 and DMM 5.3.12 on the same HW? Thanks
... View more
Labels:
Created by
epicolo
in IP Telephony and Phones
in IP Telephony and Phones
05-11-2012
01:12 PM
05-11-2012
01:12 PM
Does someone know if is it posible to register the 9971 directly on a Cisco TelePresence VCS? what about auth, dual stream, firmware upgrades, etc? thanks
... View more
10-09-2017
Hi, Yes, "Each cluster of Call Bridges needs it’s own license file, with
all of the required feature...
10-09-2017
Yes, but keep only one XMPP enabled and in case you have CMS Edge, the
trunks will need to be config...
Created by
epicolo
in TelePresence and Video Infrastructure
10-09-2017
10-09-2017
Do we configure CIMC and VMware host when installing CMS 1000? are they
accesible when the CMS is ru...
09-21-2017
If i try https://200.200.200.200:9121/status.xml (the same port, but to
read the XML pages) the code...
Created by
epicolo
in TelePresence and Video Infrastructure
09-20-2017
09-20-2017
Hello,we have a SX20 that was running CE8.2.2 without problems. This
device is behind a NAT/PAT and ...
06-20-2017
This is a new TCS cluster installation (not migration) and the customer
was using a TCS S5 appliance...
06-08-2017
The advisory list MXPs as vulnerable, but I couldn´t find any other info
regarding MXP (that runs F ...
05-18-2017
Take a look at media encryption field at CMS. Try to change and see if
it works. Use SIP Trace/debug...
Created by
epicolo
in TelePresence and Video Infrastructure
03-01-2017
03-01-2017
Hello, a customer is asking about the amount of concurrent calls it can
achieve using a Expressway a...
03-01-2017
Thanks for the explanations. So, you are confirming that Optimized
Conferencing works the same way f...
Created by
epicolo
in TelePresence and Video Infrastructure
02-24-2017
02-24-2017
Hello, lots of info regarding MM410v are missing or they are very
confusing. Searching in previous g...
Created by
epicolo
in TelePresence and Video Infrastructure
02-09-2017
02-09-2017
Warning: Check the Deployment Guides to decide if it is a Single or
Split deployment. To have your r...
Created by
epicolo
in TelePresence and Video Infrastructure
01-11-2017
01-11-2017
Hello, A customer deployment have SIP devices registered to a VCS C
(X7.2.2). The VCS have Presence ...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 01-26-2006 08:56 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-15-2018 02:19 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 218 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 33 |
Helpful Votes From
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 |
