Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Dear All,we're operating an IoT SSID leveraging the Identity PSK feature in combination with a FreeRadius Server. Now we plan to encrypt the communication between the Wireless Controller and the RADIUS server for this Identity PSK SSID using RADsec.C...
Hi, has anyone had the chance to play with "AI-Enhanced RRM" in Cisco Catalyst Center ? What has been your experience ? We have quite a few RF profiles and wonder if the cloud-based RRM really does a good job so we can lean back and stop using our ow...
Dear All,we have P2P blocking enabled on our Identity-PSK based SSID on our C9800 running Rel. 17.12.4 but now there is the need for some wifi clients to see each other while the clients still should be P2P blocked. There is a new feature called "P2P...
Dear All,after hesitating for a long time we finally reenabled FRA on our new C9800 platform 17.9.5 and so far it looks good.Question: Does anyone know how we can best verify the FRA operations ? With the CLI command "show ap fra" we just see the cur...
Dear All,after hesitating for a long time we finally enabled Flexible Radio Assignment (FRA) on our C9800 Wireless Controllers running IOS XE 17.9.5 for 5/6Ghz as well as for 2.4/5Ghz.We remember some 4 years ago when we were still running on AireOS ...
it looks like the solution to this simply is assigning the identical IPSK to all clients which should be able to see each other. Just F Y I. We tested this out successfully (with P2P Blocking Action: Allow Private Group).
Hi, yes we're using iPSK with FreeRadius (not with ISE) but for this private group feature for P2P blocking exceptions we'd like to start testing it without RADIUS by just manually creating a private group on the WLC and assigning MAC addresses to it...