Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello, i have a port channel with 3 links. The configuration is:
interface Port-channel2
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
end
!
interface GigabitEthernet2/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport ...
Hello, I have a lab environment with a layer 3 (3850) switch that has a port-channel with a layer 2 4506. What i'm seeing in the logs is a port drops off, then users come over saying they have lost their remote session into the lab: Sep 25 09:46:22: ...
Hello, I have a network where all of the vlan ip address are on the core (6509) switch and VTP replicates the vlans to other switches connected to the core. What I would like to do is move some vlans onto a lab (4506) switch and break VTP into two do...
Hello,
The other day I had our BGP setup with out ISP get interrupted and took down Internet access for the company. I managed to get this back up, but since then I am seeing a small bit of latency. Not much, a ping test shows up to 12ms on the core...
So, I had some trouble yesterday with creating some port-channels and was wondering if anybody has seen this before. I created a port-channel from my 6509 to a 4506 and tried to add two interfaces in an active mode. A couple things happened: 1. Re...
Thanks, i'll add a 4th link. Is the flow control an interface configuration on both switches? Looks like i can just use:
Flowcontrol receive on
placed on all the 4506 interfaces in the portchannel or on the portchannel itself.
I do see some overruns on the 4506 switch:
GigabitEthernet2/3 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet Port, address is 0018.73e2.0b62 (bia 0018.73e2.0b62)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability ...
Thanks, i can add another link to the channel and see if that helps.
Can high utilization typically bring an interface down in a port-channel? I'm starting to think maybe it's something else, but not sure what to check.
This command: no port-channel standalone-disable does seem to keep the port-channel up. Thanks! Now i just need to see why the interface is getting over subscribed. Thanks for the help
