Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Has anyone experienced the following?Running UCS 2.1(1a):When adding a new pair of uplinks (one per FI) to a new L2 disjointed network, existing servers (and VMs in our case) were disconnected and unreachable until the configuration was rolled back -...
We have a couple of CAPWAP 1140 aps in a remote office with HREAP enabled. 802.1X+CCKM is used for the SSID.Everything seems to work normally (local switching, RADIUS authentication, etc.), however, client roaming seems to be an issue. Clients who ...
Hello,I have a host that is on the inside of a virtual context and I need to do the following:for only UDP SNMP response traffic, use a specific IP RFC 1918 address on the outside interface of the context. for all other traffic, use the existing PAT ...
Can I do the following using an external router instead of the MSFC? I have the exact scenario that's discussed, but it's not clear as to whether I can use a dedicated router for that purpose?(See Figure 1-3)http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/...
on a 6500 with Polycom stations connected to a PoE switch module:The polycom ip 430 phones support CDP and the switch is normally able to assign them to the voice vlan without any problems. however, we just encountered an issue today where the phone...
Hello,I know that this is a very old post, however, starting in ASDM 7.1(3), there is a "Not Used" button in the app. Click it and it will provide you list of objects/groups that are not being used in ACLs. You can then choose which objects to dele...
FYI, this is the documentation for setting up the disjointed L2 uplinks:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/2.1/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_1_chapter_010110.html
Sorry to revive an old thread, but I wanted to point out that in the SRND for both UCM 8.0 (and now 8.5), Cisco states that they are moving from DSCP 26 to DSCP 24.For example, in both guides, page 3-40 has a note - "Note Cisco has transitioned the m...
the problem with the nat 0 is that I don't want to expose the internal addresses either.one problem that I discovered with dynamic PAT policy is that I cannot translate icmp traffic... that is a problem because my monitoring software will not proceed...
Thanks. For now, I'm using the MSFC, but will need to use an external router in the next few months due to needing to use subinterfaces as well as tying into other networks that I don't want the 6500 connected to.Rob.
