Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi team
I have some IW3702 with 4 antennas AIR-ANT2547V-N and working fine and the installation it's very simple use port 1,2,3 and 4. Now I need upgrade this access point for IW9167EH and I have quetions about the intefaces radios and antenna instal...
Hi Guys.
I need to know how to calculate the seizing for the interfaces in a C9800, for example if I have a c9800 in central switching whit 1Gbps uplink for 20 AP an 100 user i'm fine but if I have 200 AP whit 1000 users the requieremnt for the inter...
Hi
I have wlc9800 pair in HA mode.. in RP mode not at RP+RMI mode the chasis 2 have a priority 2 and the chasis 1 have a priority 1, and I want the chasis 2 works as my primary, is in myy primary site...in the documentation the higest number have the...
Hi Team.. In a 9800 controller if I look the client statitics in the tab Mobility History I have the value "Run Latency" in ms What's Run Lantency means... I tested the connection from the wlc and the cliente to the default gateway and I have values ...
Hi Team I´m thinking about a small DCI, we need like 40x 10G interfaces and 100G trunk interface, but I don´t know nothing about it.. for the client side I have SFP 10G interfaces... I´m looking the NSC 1001 or 1002 but I don't know if I need just a ...
Right now I have one c9800 with a port-channel LACP with 2Gbps BW the average is over 500Mbps in one interface and 200Mbps in other so I need to knowif they any math fot the interfaces.. but apparentli is not.
The failover test works fine, when are using 17.3.5c, and no when the RP goes down, both controller goes as active as expected.
Attach some log from standby when the RP goes down take control as active and then force the switchover.
Regards.
I'm aware to the N+1, just I want to know if the behavior it's OK. Because if both take the active role and the RP connectivity is recovered the chassis that have to reload should be the priority 1 not the 2.
Thanks
