Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About abbharga
Stats
Member since
10-02-2009
357
Posts
109
Helpful
75
Solutions
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
11-16-2013
08:27 AM
11-16-2013
08:27 AM
Hi Paul, Yes the above process works fine. Did you change the boot order to make sure it boots into the CD/DVD? Also can you make sure the downloaded image is proper. ./Abhinav
... View more
08-12-2013
03:05 AM
Hi David, With the 1240 and 1280 adapters on the blade you will automatically have 80 G total b/w to the FI from the blade. 40 G to side A and 40 on side B. There is a automatic port-channel created between the adapter and the blade and you are not required to configure anything else. All you need to do is create the vnic and vhba as usual in the serivce profile. ./Abhinav
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
07-11-2013
05:41 AM
07-11-2013
05:41 AM
Hi jason, In the current implementations and the firmware this is not a supported model. You still need to have a FEX for rack server integration. ./Abhinav
... View more
07-09-2013
03:11 AM
Hi Gofi, You can surely do this and there will be no issues or impact. This is fully supported, as long as there is 1:1 relation between the IOM and FI i.e. one IOM goes to one FI only. ./Abhinav
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-11-2013
11:18 PM
06-11-2013
11:18 PM
Hi Mahesh, vPC for FCoE uplink and / or unified uplinks is not supported at this time. vPC only for pure ethernet uplinks still works the same way. ./Abhinav
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-11-2013
05:58 AM
06-11-2013
05:58 AM
Hi Mahesh, Are you looking to use N5K uplink as a ethernet uplink or a FCoE uplink or both? ./Abhinav
... View more
05-29-2013
01:53 AM
Hi Adebola, Here are the URLs to the spec sheet for the C200 M2 servers: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/ps10265/ps10493/c200m2_lff_specsheet.pdf http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/ps10265/ps10493/c200m2_sff_specsheet.pdf Depending upon the server you are running, refer to the sheet to choose the controller. Pleae note these servers are out of sale now, plese check the cisco ordering tool for the availability for the adapter. Abhinav
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
05-26-2013
11:30 PM
05-26-2013
11:30 PM
Hi Stig, There can be multiple things contributing to this, once you have the TAC case we can take a more closer look at those. Abhinav
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
05-24-2013
03:47 AM
05-24-2013
03:47 AM
Hi Stig, I would recommend opening a TAC case for this and we can take a look at this in more details. I was suspecting a bug, but that is fixed in the version you running. ./Abhinav
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
05-23-2013
11:28 PM
05-23-2013
11:28 PM
Hi Stig, Can you get the UCSM version / firmware on the IOM on chassis 3 and the CIMC versions for blades 1 and 6 on chassis 3? This looks like a communication issue between the IOM and the blades on chassis 3. ./Abhinav
... View more
05-03-2013
04:56 AM
Hi Terry, It completely depends upon your storage fabric design. As a best practise it is good to have two separate VSANs and define only the required VSAN on the required fabric switched including the UCS FI. ./abhinav Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
04-19-2013
07:12 PM
04-19-2013
07:12 PM
Hi stig, A few more things to check - 1) is your storage directly connected to the FI? And do you have MDS as well? If so make sure you do not allow the same VSAN on both the uplink (this is assuming you are running version 2.1 and above) 2) if you are running 2.1 with direct attach, you need to create your zones on the FI/ UCSM level ./abhinav Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
... View more
04-01-2013
08:38 AM
Hello, B440 M2 is very much supported in 2.0.3a. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/interoperability/matrix/r_hcl_B_rel2.03.pdf However you may want to check the OS version you are planning to install on it to be supported or not. ./Abhinav
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
03-22-2013
07:25 AM
03-22-2013
07:25 AM
Hi Mike, With 2.1 we support SRIOV under which the vnic also called physical funtion can now have multiple VF i.e. virtual functions. This dynamic list is the place holder for those VF. ./Abhinav
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
in Unified Computing System Discussions
03-15-2013
06:30 AM
03-15-2013
06:30 AM
Hi Andreas, If you are using the member of attribute or AD group based authentication, then there is no need to provide an attribute. If you are not using the group role mapping then you need to specify the AD attribute which would pass the role back to UCSM for the user. ./Abhinav
... View more
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
11-16-2013
11-16-2013
Hi Paul,Yes the above process works fine. Did you change the boot order
to make sure it boots into t...
08-12-2013
Hi David,With the 1240 and 1280 adapters on the blade you will
automatically have 80 G total b/w to ...
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
07-11-2013
07-11-2013
Hi jason,In the current implementations and the firmware this is not a
supported model. You still ne...
07-09-2013
Hi Gofi,You can surely do this and there will be no issues or
impact.This is fully supported, as lon...
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-11-2013
06-11-2013
Hi Mahesh,vPC for FCoE uplink and / or unified uplinks is not supported
at this time.vPC only for pu...
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
06-11-2013
06-11-2013
Hi Mahesh,Are you looking to use N5K uplink as a ethernet uplink or a
FCoE uplink or both?./Abhinav
05-29-2013
Hi Adebola,Here are the URLs to the spec sheet for the C200 M2
servers:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/pr...
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
05-26-2013
05-26-2013
Hi Stig,There can be multiple things contributing to this, once you have
the TAC case we can take a ...
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
05-24-2013
05-24-2013
Hi Stig,I would recommend opening a TAC case for this and we can take a
look at this in more details...
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
05-23-2013
05-23-2013
Hi Stig,Can you get the UCSM version / firmware on the IOM on chassis 3
and the CIMC versions for bl...
05-03-2013
Hi Terry,It completely depends upon your storage fabric design. As a
best practise it is good to hav...
Created by
abbharga
in Unified Computing System Discussions
04-19-2013
04-19-2013
Hi stig,A few more things to check -1) is your storage directly
connected to the FI? And do you have...
04-01-2013
Hello,B440 M2 is very much supported in
2.0.3a.http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs...
03-22-2013
Hi Mike,With 2.1 we support SRIOV under which the vnic also called
physical funtion can now have mul...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 10-02-2009 11:00 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-18-2017 04:03 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 357 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 109 |
Helpful Votes From
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 2 | |
Anonymous
| 4 |
| 1 |
