I'd be curious to hear candid thoughts, advice, opinions about migrations from HyperFlex to Nutanix based on personal experience.(Four years and 10 months to go, according to the official roadmap announced to the media.)
Pre-Sales Engineering Question:When the IE-5000 ( H-Stacked ) and/or the Catalyst IE-9300 (IE-9320-22S2C4X with GPS/GNSS, StackWise) are Stacked, how does the combined switch IOS-XE instance deal with the presence of two GNSS receivers?For simplicity...
All:I recently purchased a Catalyst IE-9300 for comparison/replacement of the IE-5000.I see the Catalyst IE-9300 supports "ntp refclock ptp" (*) allowing NTP reference clock to be PTP Boundary Clock (PTP Client).Are there any other IE-series switches...
To all/anyone who has attended either [Implementing Cisco HyperFlex (DCIHX)] or similar [ ADMINISTERING CISCO DATA CENTER UNIFIED COMPUTING SYSTEM WITH INTERSIGHT] through an authorized Cisco training partner in a classroom environment:Did the class...
FYI this bug still exists four years later; I will engage with Rockwell and Cisco to address it.Also, I will check if the bug still exists in the PRP implementation on the IOS-XE based IE-9300 platform.
maybe something causing the PKI/X.509 certificate of the signing root or intermediate CA to be invalidated? Is/Are the system BIOS clocks in the past before the EUFI code signing or way in the future?In-fact, that's going to be my bonus research for ...
BTW, from any OpenSSH Client (POSIX Platform), you would just run "ssh -v -v [remote host]" to learn the version-string announced by the remote server. Take note that even if the numerical version appears to be vulnerable, there may be a Patch leve...
Okay; no advanced integrated bridging/switching function for now.Until then, we can consider:FTDv/NGFWvGuest on Cisco UCS-E module within a ASR4KExternally virtualized (FTDv/NGFWv virtual on something compact UCS Hyperflex 2-node, etc.)(Maybe in futu...
Assumption:Active/Standby1) If you're using the physical management interfaces, then I'm uncertain if those interfaces are intrinsicly exempted from HA activity and operate independent of HA/Failover; I assume-so, check it. (Fortinet has this feature...
