Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About fgasimzade
12-12-2018
Stats
Member since
01-09-2006
562
Posts
18
Helpful
6
Solutions
12-05-2018
12:28 AM
Hello, We are configuring a SIP trunk with one of our providers and we receive an Invite message which looks like this: INVITE sip:username@XX.XX.XX.XX:5060;transport=tcp;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:YY.YY.YY.YY;r2=on;lr;ftag=eeKUyK767Q15j> Record-Route: <sip:YY.YY.YY.YY;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;ftag=eeKUyK767Q15j> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP YY.YY.YY.YY;branch=z9hG4bK356e.5c8738b3173a8c5eff09817f152b0938.0;i=faf634 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.42.142;branch=z9hG4bK3301Fr3pB7mXS Max-Forwards: 53 From: "0055555555" <sip:+555555555@sip.deanconnect.nl>;tag=eeKUyK767Q15j To: <sip:+123456@sip.deanconnect.nl> The problem is, that INVITE message comes with USERNAME@IP format and we are unable to create translation patterns based on it. So, for example, if we have 5 phone numbers in our SIP trunk, all of them are coming with USERNAME@IP INVITE message Correct recipient number in our case is located in the FROM field. How can we create translation rules to use FROM field instead of INVITE? For now, we use this to modify INVITE message, but obviously, this works only for 1 number, and we need to differentiate between 5 numbers voice class sip-profiles 111 request INVITE sip-header SIP-Req-URI modify "sip:username" "sip:123456" request CANCEL sip-header SIP-Req-URI modify "sip:username" "sip:123456"
... View more
Labels:
07-13-2017
01:53 AM
UPDATE
Yesterday, when restarting the VSS, we restarted the same switch twice by mistake.
Today we restarted the second one and the problem is gone
... View more
07-12-2017
10:04 AM
We will definitely try 3.6.6, but what bothers me is that this bug was discovered a couple of weeks ago and 3.6.6 was release in 2016 (i guess)
BTW, one thing I dont understand is that in bug description the fixed versions numbering is dufferent from what I can potentially download
Looks like this bug is not related to 4500X versions, however it perfectly describe what we face
... View more
07-12-2017
09:07 AM
Hello Mark,
We reloaded the VSS one by one (not the entire shelf at once), but it did not help
This bug perfectly describes what we experience, but the images are not suitable for our model.
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCut09985/?referring_site=bugquickviewredir
Known fixed releases are
15.2(4.0.64a)E
15.2(4.0)ST
15.2(4)E
15.2(3)E2
3.8(0)E
3.7(2)E
But what I see in the download section for our model is 3.9.2 is the highest available release.
Btw, the bug was last updated on 28th of June, so looks like it was discovered recently. So, logically, we need to install the latest release dated 02 may, which is 3.9.2, however, I am not sure if it was fixed in the release
What do you think?
... View more
Created by
fgasimzade
in Cisco Bug Discussions
in Cisco Bug Discussions
07-12-2017
09:00 AM
07-12-2017
09:00 AM
Hello,
We faced the same problem on Cisco 4500x Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 03.06.03.E RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3), ROM: 15.0(1r)SG11
Which image is fixing this issue for our switch model?
Thank you
... View more
Labels:
07-10-2017
05:54 AM
Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 03.06.03.E RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
... View more
07-10-2017
05:37 AM
Hello Mark,
Thank you for your time
There are just a few errors on one of the interfaces, another one is clean.
I can not swap the interfaces now since we have only 1 working link. However, we tried another FO link with the same interface - no luck. It seems like the port is stuck in (w) state and waits the switch to be reloaded, just like when configuring VSS from the scratch.
... View more
07-10-2017
05:19 AM
Hello,
We have 2 Cisco 4500x switches configured with VSS. We have a portchanel of 2 FO links as VSL
One of the ports in portchannel went down a couple of days ago, however the port is blinking green. Port channel shows this port as waiting to be aggregated
We tried to shutdown/no shutdown the port, removed and added back to port channel, but it is still in notconnected (up/down) state with waiting to be aggregated in portchannel state
We changed the FO link, patch cords, SFP - all the same.
Port configuration is below
interface Port-channel10 description VSS-Link-10 switchport switch virtual link 1
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/16 description VSS-PO10 no lldp transmit no lldp receive no cdp enable channel-group 10 mode on service-policy output VSL-Queuing-Policy
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/15 description VSS-PO10 no lldp transmit no lldp receive channel-group 10 mode on service-policy output VSL-Queuing-Policy
interface Port-channel20 description VSS-Link-20 switchport switch virtual link 2
interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1/16 description VSS-PO20 no lldp transmit no lldp receive no cdp enable channel-group 20 mode on service-policy output VSL-Queuing-Policy
interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1/15 description VSS-PO20 no lldp transmit no lldp receive channel-group 20 mode on service-policy output VSL-Queuing-Policy
Any ideas? Are we hitting some kind of a bug?
Thank you
... View more
Labels:
02-16-2017
03:27 AM
Hello all,
Is it possible to configure active\standby for a site-to-site VPN using 2 Cisco ASA 5510 or 5520 with a single ISP
I remember I read somewhere that this was not possible, but can not find any information now
Thank you
... View more
Labels:
10-11-2016
01:26 AM
The thing is that Active switch goes into recovery when I shutdown ALL VSL links, it does not stay in active mode. So I dont really understand how both switches can become active
... View more
10-11-2016
12:59 AM
Hello,
We have a test environment with 2 4500-x switches in VSS.
We have not configured any dual-active detection, however if we shutdown VSL links, Active switch goes to recovery mode and Standby switch becomes Active
How is it possible if no dual-active detection mechanism is configured?
... View more
Labels:
09-08-2016
10:57 PM
Here are debugs, IKE MM Responder FSM error history denotes to missmatching config, but it is matching! :(
ASA01# Sep 09 09:54:22 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE MM Responder FSM error history (struct &0xd0cca5a0) <state>, <event>: MM_DONE, EV_ERROR-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, EV_TIMEOUT-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, NullEvent-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_SND_MSG-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_START_TMR-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_RESEND_MSG-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, EV_TIMEOUT-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, NullEvent
Sep 09 09:54:22 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE SA MM:42339b28 terminating: flags 0x01000002, refcnt 0, tuncnt 0
Sep 09 09:54:22 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, sending delete/delete with reason message
Sep 09 09:54:23 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:23 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received Invalid Cookie message for non-existent SA
Sep 09 09:54:24 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:24 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages to be processed when P1 SA is complete.
Sep 09 09:54:24 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received Invalid Cookie message for non-existent SA
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 192
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing SA payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Oakley proposal is acceptable
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received NAT-Traversal ver 02 VID
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received NAT-Traversal ver 03 VID
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received NAT-Traversal RFC VID
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received DPD VID
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing IKE SA payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE SA Proposal # 1, Transform # 0 acceptable Matches global IKE entry # 10
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, constructing ISAKMP SA payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, constructing NAT-Traversal VID ver 02 payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, constructing Fragmentation VID + extended capabilities payload
Sep 09 09:54:25 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:26 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:26 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received Invalid Cookie message for non-existent SA
Sep 09 09:54:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE MM Responder FSM error history (struct &0xcf5dec40) <state>, <event>: MM_DONE, EV_ERROR-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, EV_TIMEOUT-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, NullEvent-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_SND_MSG-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_START_TMR-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_RESEND_MSG-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, EV_TIMEOUT-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, NullEvent
Sep 09 09:54:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE SA MM:709ec892 terminating: flags 0x01000002, refcnt 0, tuncnt 0
Sep 09 09:54:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, sending delete/delete with reason message
Sep 09 09:54:28 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:28 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received Invalid Cookie message for non-existent SA
Sep 09 09:54:29 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:29 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages to be processed when P1 SA is complete.
Sep 09 09:54:29 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received Invalid Cookie message for non-existent SA
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 192
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing SA payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Oakley proposal is acceptable
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received NAT-Traversal ver 02 VID
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received NAT-Traversal ver 03 VID
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received NAT-Traversal RFC VID
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received DPD VID
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing IKE SA payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE SA Proposal # 1, Transform # 0 acceptable Matches global IKE entry # 10
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, constructing ISAKMP SA payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, constructing NAT-Traversal VID ver 02 payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, constructing Fragmentation VID + extended capabilities payload
Sep 09 09:54:30 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:31 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:31 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received Invalid Cookie message for non-existent SA
Sep 09 09:54:32 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE MM Responder FSM error history (struct &0xce5717c0) <state>, <event>: MM_DONE, EV_ERROR-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, EV_TIMEOUT-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, NullEvent-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_SND_MSG-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_START_TMR-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_RESEND_MSG-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, EV_TIMEOUT-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, NullEvent
Sep 09 09:54:32 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE SA MM:831cc3f6 terminating: flags 0x01000002, refcnt 0, tuncnt 0
Sep 09 09:54:32 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, sending delete/delete with reason message
Sep 09 09:54:33 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:33 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received Invalid Cookie message for non-existent SA
Sep 09 09:54:34 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
Sep 09 09:54:34 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages to be processed when P1 SA is complete.
Sep 09 09:54:34 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received Invalid Cookie message for non-existent SA
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RECEIVED Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 192
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing SA payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Oakley proposal is acceptable
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received NAT-Traversal ver 02 VID
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received NAT-Traversal ver 03 VID
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received NAT-Traversal RFC VID
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received DPD VID
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing VID payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, processing IKE SA payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE SA Proposal # 1, Transform # 0 acceptable Matches global IKE entry # 10
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, constructing ISAKMP SA payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, constructing NAT-Traversal VID ver 02 payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, constructing Fragmentation VID + extended capabilities payload
Sep 09 09:54:35 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
uSep 09 09:54:36 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message (msgid=0) with payloads : HDR + SA (1) + VENDOR (13) + VENDOR (13) + NONE (0) total length : 132
nSep 09 09:54:36 [IKEv1]: IP = X.X.X.X, Received Invalid Cookie message for non-existent SA
debug alSep 09 09:54:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE MM Responder FSM error history (struct &0xd0cd2760) <state>, <event>: MM_DONE, EV_ERROR-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, EV_TIMEOUT-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, NullEvent-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_SND_MSG-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_START_TMR-->MM_SND_MSG2, EV_RESEND_MSG-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, EV_TIMEOUT-->MM_WAIT_MSG3, NullEvent
Sep 09 09:54:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, IKE SA MM:aa81b7c9 terminating: flags 0x01000002, refcnt 0, tuncnt 0
Sep 09 09:54:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = X.X.X.X, sending delete/delete with reason message
l
... View more
09-08-2016
07:10 AM
Yes, looks like UDP 500 is OK
1: 18:08:01.952038 802.1Q vlan#30 P0 X.X.X.X.500 > Y.Y.Y.Y.500: udp 132 2: 18:08:02.033735 802.1Q vlan#30 P0 Y.Y.Y.Y.500 > X.X.X.X.500: udp 56
... View more
12-05-2018
Hello,We are configuring a SIP trunk with one of our providers and we
receive an Invite message whic...
07-13-2017
UPDATE Yesterday, when restarting the VSS, we restarted the same switch
twice by mistake. Today we r...
07-12-2017
We will definitely try 3.6.6, but what bothers me is that this bug was
discovered a couple of weeks ...
07-12-2017
Hello Mark, We reloaded the VSS one by one (not the entire shelf at
once), but it did not help This ...
07-12-2017
Hello, We faced the same problem on Cisco 4500x Cisco IOS Software,
IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L...
07-10-2017
Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software
(cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M), Vers...
07-10-2017
Hello Mark, Thank you for your time There are just a few errors on one
of the interfaces, another on...
07-10-2017
Hello, We have 2 Cisco 4500x switches configured with VSS. We have a
portchanel of 2 FO links as VSL...
02-16-2017
Hello all, Is it possible to configure active\standby for a site-to-site
VPN using 2 Cisco ASA 5510 ...
10-11-2016
The thing is that Active switch goes into recovery when I shutdown ALL
VSL links, it does not stay i...
10-11-2016
Hello, We have a test environment with 2 4500-x switches in VSS. We have
not configured any dual-act...
09-08-2016
Here are debugs, IKE MM Responder FSM error history denotes to
missmatching config, but it is matchi...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 01-09-2006 04:04 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 12-12-2018 12:33 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 562 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 18 |
Helpful Votes Given To
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 |
.jpg "Hall of Fame Community Legend"){kind=icon}
Helpful Votes From
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 5 |
