Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Chanuka D
Stats
Member since
10-01-2017
15
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
Created by
Chanuka D
in Network Management
in Network Management
10-31-2019
04:50 AM
10-31-2019
04:50 AM
Hi Guys, We have ASR1001-HX and ASR1002-HX in our company. Each router has 8 x 1G ports and 8 x 10G ports. Currently we are using all the ports in 1002-HX and 1001-HX is out of production. During first implementation of our network local cisco support engineer helped us to install some licenses on rou However now I want to activate all the 1G ports and 10G ports in both routers. I have posted "show license all" outputs from both routers for your reference. Please assist me to understand how many 1G and 10G ports I can use in each router and how many 1G and 10G ports need extra license to purchase. ASR1001-HX -------------------- show license all License Store: Primary License Storage StoreIndex: 0 Feature: interface_10g Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, Not in Use License Count: 2/0/0 (Active/In-use/Violation) License Priority: Medium StoreIndex: 1 Feature: advipservices Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium License Store: Built-In License Storage StoreIndex: 0 Feature: adventerprise Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 1 Feature: advipservices Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Inactive Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 2 Feature: avc Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 3 Feature: fwnat_red Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 4 Feature: ipsec Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 5 Feature: lawful_intr Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 6 Feature: lisp Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 7 Feature: otv Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 8 Feature: sw_redundancy Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 9 Feature: vpls Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 10 Feature: FoundationSuiteK9 Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 11 Feature: AdvUCSuiteK9 Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 12 Feature: 1HXIPS8G Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 13 Feature: 1HX8G16G Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 14 Feature: interface_10g Version: 1.0 License Type: RightToUse License State: Inactive License Count: 0/0 (In-use/Violation) License Priority: Low StoreIndex: 15 Feature: interface_1g Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: 0/0 (In-use/Violation) License Priority: Low ASR1002-HX ---------------------- crw-gw-1-sbjmen-pip.my#show license all License Store: Primary License Storage StoreIndex: 0 Feature: interface_10g Version: 1 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, Not in Use License Count: 2/0/0 (Active/In-use/Violation) License Priority: Medium StoreIndex: 1 Feature: advipservices Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium StoreIndex: 3 Feature: interface_10g Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: 4/2/0 (Active/In-use/Violation) License Priority: Medium License Store: Built-In License Storage StoreIndex: 0 Feature: adventerprise Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 1 Feature: advipservices Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Inactive Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 2 Feature: avc Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 3 Feature: fwnat_red Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 4 Feature: ipsec Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 5 Feature: lawful_intr Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 6 Feature: lisp Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 7 Feature: otv Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 8 Feature: sw_redundancy Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 9 Feature: vpls Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 10 Feature: FoundationSuiteK9 Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 11 Feature: AdvUCSuiteK9 Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 12 Feature: 2HXIPS8G Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 13 Feature: 2HX8G16G Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 14 Feature: 2HX8G25G Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 15 Feature: 2HX16G25G Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 8 weeks 4 days Period used: 0 minute 0 second License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None StoreIndex: 16 Feature: interface_10g Version: 1.0 License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Inactive Evaluation total period: 8 weeks 4 days Evaluation period left: 7 weeks 5 days Period used: 5 days 3 hours License Count: 0/0 (In-use/Violation) License Priority: Low StoreIndex: 17 Feature: interface_1g Version: 1.0 License Type: RightToUse License State: Active, In Use License Count: 2/0 (In-use/Violation) License Priority: Low
... View more
Labels:
05-16-2018
03:40 AM
Dear fellow engineers,
We are a small ISP and we have customers who subscribe our IP transit services. Currently I'm using class-map and policy-map to limit their bandwidth as you can see in this config. Then I apply policy map into sub interface in both directions using service-policy input and service policy output command. The problem I'm facing now is this allows customer to use download 100M and upload 100M if they subscribe 100Mbps. Now I need cap their total traffic which combines upload and download into 100Mbps. Since I'm using sub interface bandwidth command is not available. How do I achieve this ?
class-map match-all SDW00014 match any ! policy-map SDW00014 class SDW00014 police 55000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
... View more
Labels:
12-25-2017
05:18 PM
Hi Harold,
Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge with us. Appreciated !
... View more
12-23-2017
10:39 PM
Hi Harold,
Thank you very much for your clear explanation. I have one last question to ask from you. You mentioned that remaining bandwidth will be use for non MPLS TE traffic. Does that mean remaining bandwidth will be use for both IP traffic and normal MPLS forwading ? or you mean IP traffic only ? Thanks .
... View more
12-23-2017
01:14 AM
Hi Harold,
Thank you for your explanation. Is it the total bandwidth I can use for any number of TE tunnels ? Let's say I reserve 750Mbps from a 1G interface by using ip rsvp bandwidth command. So I can use 750Mbps for TE tunnels and remaining 250 for normal forwarding. Is my understanding correct ? Kindly describe more if I'm wrong. Thanks.
... View more
12-22-2017
12:52 AM
Hi smailmilak,
Thank you very much for your response. I appreciate if you could explain what is RSVP how it works and how it integrates with MPLS TE. Please see my reply to Harold also. Thank you very much !
... View more
12-22-2017
12:46 AM
Hi Harold,
Thank you very much. You helped me again to overcome my problem. I already used following commands before start this discussion.
(config)#mpls traffic-eng tunnels
(config-if)#mpls traffic-eng tunnels
(config-router)#mpls traffic-eng area 9
(config-router)mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
But the tunnel didn't come up. Then after referring the documentation you provided I found that I missed one command.
(config-if)#ip rsvp bandwidth XXX XXX
Right after I entered this command under interface config my tunnel just came up. But I still have a one concern though. I reserved 300Mbps by using ip rsvp bandwidth command under my interfaces in cisco core router which is connecting to my edges. Can you please explain me how this command works ? This bandwidth is reserved for particular tunnel I created or all the tunnels that I'm gonna create in future as well ? Kindly explain. Thanks again.
... View more
12-21-2017
07:50 PM
Hi smailmilak,
crw-gw-1-sbjmen-pip.my#sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels
P2P TUNNELS/LSPs:
P2MP TUNNELS:
P2MP SUB-LSPS: crw-gw-1-sbjmen-pip.my#
Here is the output requested. No info to display.
... View more
12-21-2017
08:12 AM
Hi all,
We are having this topology in our network and I want to build a TE tunnel between two edge routers. For edge routers I followed the exact steps which was described in documentation. But TE tunnels are coming up. MPLS is functioning properly and do label switching. Loopbacks are reachable. Is there any additional configurations to be done in cisco router as well in this scenario ? What could cause TE tunnels not to come up from cisco router's perspective ? Thanks.
... View more
Labels:
12-21-2017
03:22 AM
Hi Harold,
Thank you very much for your support and appreciated. It helped me a lot to understand how MPLS works. Thanks again.
... View more
11-29-2017
07:55 PM
Hi Harold, Thank you very much for clarifying me. I was confused about this operation. However I have one more question. How can I verify label imposition and php is being done in a router ?? Which debug command I should use ? I tried few different mpls debugging commands, but no output. Thank you Chanu
... View more
11-26-2017
11:45 PM
Hi Harold, I aware about the things that you clarified. Just like you mentioned as the first point, our border router should impose a label and forward it to core routers. But I can't see anything on forwarding table. Is it normal ? core routers are popping label as they are directly connected to LERs.
Thank you.
... View more
11-26-2017
02:54 AM
Hi Harold, Thank you again. Please note that currently we don't have any VPN configurations. Just basic MPLS configuration. Our cisco border router which is facing our upstream, connected to two core routers and all our edges are connected to that two core routers. we two total 8 edge routers. OSPF is running as IGP. According to my understanding any traffic coming from our upstream should assign a label by MPLS and forward to core routers by border router unless destinations are directly connected to core routers. (PHP). But my question is although there are LDP neighbors I can't see anything on forwarding table. When I do a trace route from a looking glass, I can't see MPLS label on border router. But I can see core routers labels. I hope you will understand my concern. Kindly correct me If I'm wrong.
Thank you. Chanu
... View more
11-24-2017
11:40 PM
Hi Harold, Thank you very much for your response. we have a another router at one of our edges. In mpls forwarding-table I can see outgoing labels. But 0 bytes label switched. I'm confused why it's not doing label switching. LDP relationship is there. Any idea what's happening ? Thanks. Chanuka
... View more
11-19-2017
02:21 AM
Hi Guys, I configured basic MPLS configuration on our core routers and border router. I can see ldp neighbor relationship by using show mpls ldp neighbors command in border router.
But when see mpls forwading-table in border router not even one byte is label switched. Note that labels are exchanged and assigned to routes. OSPF is running as IGP. Core router is label switching according to the forwarding table. What could cause border router to avoid label switching ? Thanks.
... View more
Labels:
10-31-2019
Hi Guys, We have ASR1001-HX and ASR1002-HX in our company. Each router
has 8 x 1G ports and 8 x 10G ...
12-23-2017
Hi Harold, Thank you very much for your clear explanation. I have one
last question to ask from you....
12-23-2017
Hi Harold, Thank you for your explanation. Is it the total bandwidth I
can use for any number of TE ...
12-22-2017
Hi smailmilak, Thank you very much for your response. I appreciate if
you could explain what is RSVP...
12-22-2017
Hi Harold, Thank you very much. You helped me again to overcome my
problem. I already used following...
12-21-2017
Hi smailmilak, crw-gw-1-sbjmen-pip.my#sh mpls traffic-eng tunnels P2P
TUNNELS/LSPs: P2MP TUNNELS: P2...
12-21-2017
Hi all, We are having this topology in our network and I want to build a
TE tunnel between two edge ...
12-21-2017
Hi Harold, Thank you very much for your support and appreciated. It
helped me a lot to understand ho...
11-29-2017
Hi Harold, Thank you very much for clarifying me. I was confused about
this operation. However I hav...
11-26-2017
Hi Harold,I aware about the things that you clarified. Just like you
mentioned as the first point, o...
11-26-2017
Hi Harold, Thank you again. Please note that currently we don't have any
VPN configurations. Just ba...
11-24-2017
Hi Harold,Thank you very much for your response. we have a another
router at one of our edges. In mp...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 10-01-2017 01:48 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 02-19-2020 03:49 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 15 |
Helpful Votes Given To
