Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi All,
I'm having below setup in my network. ISRs are is acting as route-reflectors. Huawei F1A is a route reflect client. MikroTik 1 and 2 are normal iBGP peers. Huawei F1A is advertising 2 prefixes to route-reflectors via iBGP. However, these two ...
Hi Guys, We have ASR1001-HX and ASR1002-HX in our company. Each router has 8 x 1G ports and 8 x 10G ports. Currently we are using all the ports in 1002-HX and 1001-HX is out of production. During first implementation of our network local cisco suppor...
Dear fellow engineers,
We are a small ISP and we have customers who subscribe our IP transit services. Currently I'm using class-map and policy-map to limit their bandwidth as you can see in this config. Then I apply policy map into sub interface i...
Hi all,
We are having this topology in our network and I want to build a TE tunnel between two edge routers. For edge routers I followed the exact steps which was described in documentation. But TE tunnels are coming up. MPLS is functioning properly ...
Hi Guys, I configured basic MPLS configuration on our core routers and border router. I can see ldp neighbor relationship by using show mpls ldp neighbors command in border router.
But when see mpls forwading-table in border router not even one byt...
Hi,The huawei next-hop is also reachable from Mikro. there is no issue on that. I did try to set next-hop via a route map and it did not work. The prefixes are still not advertised to Mikro 1
Hi Paul,I have checked everywhere in my network but I couldn't find any redistribution of particular next-hop IP. For you 2nd question yes RRC are peered only with both RR. BGP router ID is not manually set. loopback interface is used as router IDTh...
