Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello, I am noticing that our 3550 and 3750 equipment either do not seem to work as expected with or do not respond to some of the portEntry oids referenced in the CISCO-STACK-MIB. The two that are frustrating me are portName and portAdditionalOperSt...
We are trying to set ports with dynamic membership for both primary and auxiliary vlans. According to documentation I found, this is accomplished by setting the port to dynamic membership, the aux vlan to untagged and having both device MAC addresses...
We often have our older Catalyst 5000 and 5500 devices report a 'No Response' failure for scheduled VMPS reconfirmations. Manually forcing a reconfirmation one or more times will eventually succeed. I have been able to watch traffic between a client ...
this is perhaps not the proper forum for this, but I am not sure who to ask. We have one user with a 7960 who wishes to use a cordless headset. We have purchased a plantronics cordless amplifier and headset. It works fine. We also purchased the hands...
We have Ciscoview 4.2(1.0) running on Solaris 2.6. I am trying to view some Catalyst 4006's (we have package version 4.2(1.2) installed). I cannot even open the switch.Normally, when I mouse over a device, I get the name or IP address with the device...
We got a Cisco 871 a few months ago and I specifically asked for the advanced IP services software upgrade so that I could use this MIB. If I query for sysORDescr I do see the following response from this router:SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.37 = STRING: ...
I'm having the same issue trying to install 4.1(2) on a PE1950 with the SAS 5/i controller. Although, I do not have any messages after the kernel panic message - i.e. that message occurs last.
This is a Catalyst 6513 w/MSFC2 in hybrid mode. We are running 7.6(5) CatOS and 12.1(11b)E IOS. We have sup720's that are not yet installed, hopefully any solution will also work on the 720.
I have been told that this is actually explained in a paper somewhere on this site. From what I have been able to gather, if there is even 1 port that does not reconfirm then the overall status is set to 'No Response'. I think what is causing this is...
