Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have been puzzled by this for sometime and have been trying to get to the bottom of it.I have 2 routers connected via a 10Mb FD Ethernet link and on router 1 I am traffic shaping outbound on this link with the following config: Policy Map SHAPE ...
I can't seem to find any information on this but I always understood that fair-queue was for low bandwidth links i.e. sub 2Mb.Is fair-queue viable as part of a CBWFQ policy on a 25Mb Ethernet WAN link? And should the conversations be altered as I un...
I just want to know if I have understood this correctly. If I have a port connected at 100Mb Full duplex with the following config:srr-queue bandwidth shape 0 2 0 0srr-queue bandwidth limit 18Would this limit bandwidth to 18Mbit and also limit Queue...
HiIs it possible to apply traffic shaping per vlan on a trunk link? We have 2 vlan's going out to our provider which is 40Mb, 10Mb is for Internet and 30Mb for WAN traffic both on different vlan's. Is it possible to shape these Vlan's seperatly? T...
Hi allI have a 2800 router connected to a switch which is conifgured as a trunk port to carry 2 vlans. We want one of the vlans to be passed onto another switch through the router as we are only allowed a single connection on the first switch. The ...
The shape command in this scenario as it is allows 1/2 or 50% of the physical bandwidth which was 100Mb so 50Mb. As I have a limit of 18Mb it would peak at 18Mb when in relaity I only wanted it to use 9Mb.So bandwidth shape 0 11 0 0 would give 9Mb f...
I have tested this in a lab and bot bandwidth shape and limit work off the physical speed rather than shape working off what limit is set at so my config was wrong. No need for a response now.