Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello, I'm trying to allow cacti to only graph a single port on our Cisco 6500 Sup 720 Router.Specifically port te4/1 which has index of 202.TenGigabitEthernet4/1: Ifindex = 202 I know command to allow it would be:snmp-server view test ifEntry.*.202...
Hello, I'm trying to allow cacti to only graph a single port on our Cisco 6500 Sup 720 Router.Specifically port te4/1 which has index of 202.TenGigabitEthernet4/1: Ifindex = 202 I know command to allow it would be:snmp-server view test ifEntry.*.202...
Hi,I just can't seem to understand this. I have 2x switches and 2x routers.R1, has vlan 10, 20, and 50 configured on it.R2, has vlan 30 only on itS1 is trunked to R1 and carries vlan 20 for switch management, and vlan 50 for serversR2 is trunked to R...
Installed 2 new 6704-10gb blades in 2x 6509 routers.Routers are already configured with 1x 10gb-LR crossconnect between each router with a simple /30 between them. Working fine.After the upgrade. Initially I want to setup a 30gb port channel between ...
Hi,I have a Cisco 2511-RJ with 16 async RJ-45 built in ports. I can't seem to get the thing to work.I want to connect the rj-45 ports to the console ports of Cisco 6500 sup2s and sup720 routers.A) what type of cable is needed? Roll over? or Straight ...
S1 layer2 switchR1 6509 sup720 routerR2 6509 sup720 routerS2 layer2 switchI guess my problem is in the understanding that since r1 has vlans on it, and r2 has vlans on it, i don't want them to share all the vlans from each other, only a few such as v...
We are using:Version 12.2(18)SXF9If it didn't support it, then the other blade wouldn't be working fine.Nor would ipv6 work really odd that ipv4 doesn't work.I even swapped blades around, and just doesn't work in slot 4 for ipv4.
yep that was the issue!Thank you very much for your help. Removed the blade, and now it does 512K default, or up to 1000K (1million routes) as it was supposed to.Thanks again!
By just having that card in the router decreases the entire performance? That blade is actually not in use even. I can remove it, but why wouldn't it still have enough cpu/ram to handle full routing table from 2 ebgp peers, and 6 ibgp peers?Thanks,
