This is an appalling bug. This bug ID does NOT exist in UCS 4.3 release notes! To add insult to injury, UCS 4.3 (4a) is a 'gold star' recommended version at the time of writing! WHY!? We have had detrimental fallout as a result of this bug and s...
Customer wants to turn off DLP notification if the email is sent in Secure(Encrypted) format which I have configured on the Ironport. So whatever is in the email will be ignored by DLP Manager if sent encrypted? Wouldn't this defeat purpose of send...
Thank for the details on your end @martinc_intact. Interesting note on the FIs and IOMs remaining on 4.3 (4b). Please do keep us apprised of your other domains and how the upgrades fair for you.
Thank you, mysterious recent wko@cisco.com employee. This is the first time someone directly related to Cisco is acknowledging a specifical component of the UCS stack associated with the bug, let alone has provided reasoning for why an upgrade (or d...
Thanks for the insights @kdmh. That seems to be the consensus at the moment...any activity or administrative action that results in a shallow discovery of a service profile will result in this bug showing up.The number of cases is now officially 19,...
Thanks for the update @jonmiller5555. We have heard from another Cisco UCS customer of a 4.3 (4e) update pending release. We have also been told by our TAC engineers that an upgrade to 4.3 (5a) or the soon-to-be 4.3 (4e) would be non-disruptive and...
The latest developments we've noticed:CSCwk91747 has received another update. The Bug ID page now reflects 4.3 (5a) UCSM as the "Known Fixed Release." If anyone has the luxury of owning a full non-production or lab stack of UCS equipment with FC co...
