Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
My usual post on here. I have run into cases where production-worthy MX firmware upgrades introduced impactful bugs that forced rollback. The past year or two involved 1:1 NAT hosts having sporadic connectivity issues, MX network utilization being er...
So I have this scheduled to upgrade on 7/10/2024. Wondering if there are any trouble reports from early adopters out there that anyone can speak to. I know that a few months ago I had to revert back a Meraki firmware update that tanked our main HQ's ...
So our corporate network has a remote access service as a published 1:1 NAT host through our MX 75. Due to the nature of remote access, I can't just whitelist our corporate LAN's for inbound access. People work remotely, that's the idea. Rather than...
This is an odd one. We have five sites all interconnected via site VPN's. Each endpoint is a Cisco ASA 5505. All seems to be well, and the site VPN's have been in place for years. Lately one particular site had been reporting issues per our alarm mon...
So I have native VLAN 1 for the client/server data hosts. And want to implement VLAN 11 for Polycom IP phones. I have a test lab with an SG300 and it's working fine. All computers that patch into the Polycoms are members of VLAN 1 and the phones them...
Here were the specifics, in terms of what I was describing. From the Meraki ticket."I believe you are running into a known issue on the MX 18.211.2 firmware where Client Usage Data does not match what is seen in the application table. With that said ...
No I mean network utilization. Our headquarters typically displays 400 GB of usage over a week's time. It was reporting 3-4 TB in the organization overview page on the Meraki cloud dashboard. And for certain periods this was spiking and firing off al...
...and I did see this post --> https://community.meraki.com/t5/Security-SD-WAN/New-MX-19-1-7-1-other-release-fixes-issue-with-many-clients/m-p/261853#M58047. Just wondering about customer end-users and their real world experiences since this post was...
The operative term "more fixes" sounds promising. Although how many of the fixes were for bugs introduced with the last few point version firmware updates? When a firmware update is flagged as a stable release then one would hope that it went through...
