Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We are in the process of developing a disastery recovery plan. I was wondering if our SMARTnet coverage would replace equipment damaged or destroyed in a disaster.If I read this correctly, the answer is no:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/prod_warrant...
Hi,I have a PIX 525 at my main site and a 1721 router at a remote location. I used the PDM and SDM to set up an IPSec site-to-site VPN connection. In my private network, I use 10.1.0.0/16 for the main site and 10.x.0.0/16 (where x=2 through 47) for t...
Hi, I am using a PIX 525 at our main site, and one of the remote sites uses a 1721 router. The 1721 connects to DSL. All traffic is forced to use a VPN between the remote and main sites. The intention was to force the remote site's internet traffic t...
Rick,This is working now that the two access lists on the PIX have been changed!I am still testing with allowing traffic from 10.2 to go to 10.19, so my access lists on the PIX are now:access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl permit ip 10.1.0.0 255.255.0...
Rick,I used the SDM to change access list 100. It warned me about needing to change access list 101 so that this new VPN traffic would not be NATed, and it changed it for me. I've attached the new config that shows that this seems to be okay.I will t...
Rick,Yes, all other sites are connected over leased lines within the private network. Everything is connected to the 10.1.0.0 main site through one or more routers that our service provider owns and maintains at their head end. The lines from all sch...
Hi Rick,Thanks for the reply.The PIX is running 6.3(4) and the 1721 is running 12.4.That is part of the inbound access list for the outside interface on the 1721.I've attached some partial configs that should clarify things, please let me know if you...
