I have experimented with a new RV160W router (firmware version 1.0.01.01) and observed the same fail...

It's very satisfying to know that my "problem" has been accepted, and moved up the ladder, by one of...

Thank you, Martin, for the encouragement. I don't have a service contract with Cisco, so initiating ...

Hi Martin,Thanks for the reply and the recommendation to open a case. I've never done that before, a...

Yes.At first I was off by an hour, by reason that these routers failed toautomatically change from P...

Look to the RV160w instead! Less buggy, cheaper and better. Has four VLANs. wi-fi galore. The RV340 ...

I administer three RV340s. They're all running firmware 1.0.03.20. This fault has been observed in e...

Please clarify/correct. L2TP is a Layer Two VPN, according to the OSI Seven Layer Model. IPSec opera...

Mr. Gatsev has advised incorrectly. The original poster is seeking NAT TRAVERSAL, not mere NAT.

@Georg Pauwen Georg Pauwen The PDF you provided has a critical deletion on page 1; regards the neede...

Ms. Calero and Mr. Raizada have both cited, and thankfully, provided the same-named PDF setup advice...

On Thursday, March 7, 2019, I obtained attained, quite exactly, tonyatsp's level of success, and "fa...

Well, I say it's a bug, not an intentional malfunction.I'm angry with Cisco's Small Business Line, f...

Can anyone advise, on how his or her need for PPTP was filled? Obviously, some other pathway, some o...

This is an obvious BUG in the RV340's firmware, as PPTP server function worked in predecessor equipm...