Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
A couple of our large offices have MS355-48X2 stacks with 2 - 5 switch members. We've gone through several firmware upgrades (currently going from MS 16.9 to MS 17.1.4) and found the stack upgrade behavior is consistent:Stacks with 2-3 members have ...
Hi,As the subject states, are there limitations/pitfalls to using Meraki Cloud Authentication to manage SSID access? User credential mgmt. looks forward but curious:Are there limitation on the number of credentials that can be created?There doesn't s...
We have East & Midwest data centers. The DC are linked together with P2P circuits and we're running BGP between them for dynamic routing.Branch office MXs have AutoVPN tunnels to each DCPrimary AutoVPN is the nearest DC & backup is the farther DCDC M...
I simulated our production VXLAN/OTV configuration within CML v1.5.148. The fabric and 'core' switches are all running NX-OSv 9000 images. Since the NX-OSv 9000 images don't support VDCs, I simulated OTV using a pair of CSR1000v nodes. Traffic acros...
We currently have a Midwest & East Coast DC utilizing N7Ks as the cores. The DCs are interconnected with OTV & EIGRP; dark fiber terminates to the CORE VDCs within each N7K. We plan to migrate off of the N7Ks and onto a spine/leaf architecture based...
No, guests are simply provided pre-printed credentials for the captive portal which is more than adequate. The challenge is managing corporate user WIFI experience against compliance requirements, because of this, we'll likely continue using ISE.
We're looking to manage corporate employee & guest (captive portal) WIFI access. We're doing this today via ISE a) it's kludgy and b) we may be moving away from ISE altogether. Corporate users are simply looking for the "hotel" experience where the...
Hi DouggieFresh,How's this solution been working for you ever since it was deployed? You mentioned you needed to create a separate network for the MX84. Is that because you have different MX models in your existing network already and Meraki won't a...
That's not possible to control from the spoke side... That's the conclusion I'm coming to. The minute a unique prefix is advertised from one DC, spokes could end up taking the backup hub connection. And because our DCs exchange routes, DC "return" t...