Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,I am trying to clarify whether the BE class will drop down to nothing before traffic from AF classes starts dropping (highest drop precedence first, of course). This would mean an important but greedy application could kill all general network tra...
I am having trouble finding the information I am looking for. Example: on a 10Mbit Ethernet access circuit into an IP VPN (mpls) with a CAR/CIR of 4Mb, the standard configuration would be a hierarchical/nested policy-map which would "shape average". ...
Hi all,If you have a server on a LAN (say 192.168.20.100) and you have IPsec LAN-to-LAN sites that can talk to each other, including the server, then you have a fairly standard scenario. If you then need the Internet to be able to talk to that server...
Would that work? I don't have deep enough understanding of how Tx Q (which I have been told plays no part in this scenario), Shaper and CBWFQ interact in a hierarchical structure. It would seem sensible that the shaper simply pushes the queue back th...
Check out the feature navigator on this website. It will provide you will the details. From my experience, an 870 router will ship with Advanced Security which provides you with VPN functionality (IPsec/SSL). If you want multiple VLANs you will need ...
I have been considering very similar designs to this recently and have been wondering what hardware would be suitable. Another thought would be, is this the kind of scenario that would suit a collapsed core or should there be a dedicated distribution...
It's ok. I found the solution. You need to use a conditional route-map on the end of the inbound NAT statement. This will exempt the VPN sites from the static mapping that you define. Easy when you know how:)
