Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Attached topology. All routers interfaces are part of the same /24 & area 0. 1.1.1.1/32 is adv. from both R1 & R4. Is there a way I can influence R5 to prefer R1 over R4?
Is there a way I can redistribute
ospf<>bgp
to only to1 specific neighbor?
For eg:
router bgp 1neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 2neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 3
I want to redistribute OSPF learned routes but ONLY to 2.2.2.2. How can I do that?
Per the Cisco doc, it states not to configure PVLAN on an interface with Voice but almost all enterprises will have user & voice on the same interface so how can I implement pvlan?what would be the equivalent pvlan config for this? user/phone interfa...
What is the significance/impact of using switchport protected in Trunk ports that connect two switches? For eg.SW1int gi0/1-->Access VLAN 10-->switchport protected-->Host Aint gi0/24-->Switchport mode Trunk-->switchport protected (des link to SW2)***...
I am testing a PVLAN scenario in a lab environment. The goal is to implement it in production eventually. Please see attached topology I am working on. I read when implementing PVLAN in a ROAS situation we have to implement a Private VLAN trunk which...
Yes that works but it blocked everything else as well. So I guess we will have to deny from 192.168.0.5 and allow everything else?R5#sh ip route os1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnetsO 1.1.1.1 [110/2] via 192.168.0.1, 00:00:05, FastEthernet0/0*********...
Thank you. Can you do a lab with distribute-list as it didn't work for me?It would look something like the following:route-map test permit 10match ip address prefix-list prefix1match ip next-hop prefix-list nh1!ip prefix-list nh1 seq 5 permit <nextho...