Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Attached topology. All routers interfaces are part of the same /24 & area 0. 1.1.1.1/32 is adv. from both R1 & R4. Is there a way I can influence R5 to prefer R1 over R4?
Is there a way I can redistribute
ospf<>bgp
to only to1 specific neighbor?
For eg:
router bgp 1neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 2neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 3
I want to redistribute OSPF learned routes but ONLY to 2.2.2.2. How can I do that?
Per the Cisco doc, it states not to configure PVLAN on an interface with Voice but almost all enterprises will have user & voice on the same interface so how can I implement pvlan?what would be the equivalent pvlan config for this? user/phone interfa...
Hello, I am brand new to Meraki wireless world, and I have received a few demo APs for POC. Looking for some guidance/suggestions on below:1. Is there a way for Meraki AP to make an API call to Intune to validate if the device is compliant? Currently...
Hello, I am brand new to Meraki wireless world, and I have received a few demo APs for POC. Looking for some guidance/suggestions on below:1. Is there a way for Meraki AP to make an API call to Intune to validate if the device is compliant? Currently...
Are you using credential based auth (MSCHAPV2) or cert based? (EAP-TLS)I assume If you are using EAP-TLS local auth, you will never need to communicate with the Radius server as authentication occurs locally rather than creating any cache.
"In Meraki I have a secondary check after association, if the machine is enrolled in MDM, so the certificate is used just to connect to the wireless eth, get an IP address then the MDM check kicks in. "--> How are you doing this secondary check? Does...
Yes that works but it blocked everything else as well. So I guess we will have to deny from 192.168.0.5 and allow everything else?R5#sh ip route os1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnetsO 1.1.1.1 [110/2] via 192.168.0.1, 00:00:05, FastEthernet0/0*********...
Thank you. Can you do a lab with distribute-list as it didn't work for me?It would look something like the following:route-map test permit 10match ip address prefix-list prefix1match ip next-hop prefix-list nh1!ip prefix-list nh1 seq 5 permit <nextho...