Hello everyone,This week, we upgraded ACI from release 4.2(7f) to 5.2(8i). The process was straightforward and went smoothly. However, since the upgrade, we have encountered an issue with log reception.Without changing any configurations, in the prev...
Hello everyone,I'm reaching out to the Cisco community for assistance with a problem I'm encountering regarding the assignment of a Provided Contract to vzANY in Cisco ACI. I've tried various solutions but so far haven't been able to resolve this iss...
Dear Community,I would like to run a command on ACI where it is possible to see on each contract having the IP_ANY filter who is the Consumed and who is the Provider.APIC Version: 4.2(7f)Currently I was able to extrapolate which contracts use the IP_...
Dear Colleagues,I'm reaching out to the community to seek clarification regarding the upgrade of Cisco ISE from version 2.7 patch 8 to 3.2 patch 2. Currently, I have a cluster consisting of two virtual nodes, both with the following specifications:OS...
Good morning Cisco Community,I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to seek your support in resolving a recurring issue related to backup scheduling on my N5K-C5672UP-16G device, with version 7.3(0)N1(1).I am currently attempting to im...
Hi @RedNectar ,Forgive if I have misinterpreted your previous message.Analyzing it better I confirm that your scenario can make much sense and could also give the desired results without having to create a double contract. Unfortunately such an actio...
Hi @RedNectar ,Forgive the wait but I was very busy in this period.In any case, my problem was not related to the creation of the contract, but the impossibility of associating it with vzAny because it is impossible by GUI. In any case, I solved my p...
Hi @RedNectar ,Yes, for AD communication there is a need for both the contract where all the EPGs contact the Domain Controllers and for the Domain Controllers to contact all the EPGs therefore I had to create two different contracts and correctly as...
Hi @husamabobakr,What you ask is a very interesting scenario that does not generate impacts if the cluster is configured optimally. Once the controllers are down, both the thorns and the leaf will continue to work. The only disservice that you will h...
Hi @RedNectar I'll explain everything briefly to you. in tenant common I have different VRFs depending on the traffic. In this case, I have to apply to my production traffic (which I will call VRF-PROD) I will have to apply an infrastructure contract...
