Hi @kekkophone ,
https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-centric-infrastructure/new-static-bind-in-mutiple-epg/m-p/5171527/highlight/true#M16049
Regards
Hi @Rez81370 ,
The straight answer is Yes you can.
But the question is, why would you need higher bandwidth only from 1 pair to your Spines? To go where? Most of the UCS-to-UCS traffic will stay on Leaf 101/102. And if you don't have Mulit-Pod/Multi-...
@weylin.piegorsch , to better understand your output and the pcTags, please show the screenshot of Tenant > Operational > VRFs, Tenant > Operational > EPGs, and Tenant > Operational > L3Outs
Hi @SIMMN ,
Yes. The source, the destinations, and the remaining Vl100 workloads need to be each in their own EPG to implement what you describe. That also assumes you set the Vlan IDs different or handle specific design to allow Vlan ID re-use.
It i...
