Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi all, I just wanted to ask if anyone has seen (or maybe heard or wondered) if VxLAN running on an underlay network with a maximum MTU Size of 1500 bytes, might be able to transmit JUMBO frames. In other words, is there an option in VxLAN that anyon...
Hello Community, another conundrum that I am trying to solve - seems like I am very close to solution but there might be some concepts I don't have a full grasp on - so asking help from the community Here is a visual: Below is all the related conf...
Hello Community, got another riddle for you ... this is a strange one because it's a custom implementation but I hope it's feasible. Will start with a Diagram : Considering the diagram above and traffic flow from left to right, is there a way for the...
Hello all, been a couple of days in total since I started to investigate Multicast Routing on the 9300 CISCO Catalyst (Gibraltar V.16.12.02) Have been looking around on forums and seems like my application is a little bit too specific, not a common s...
Hello community, have been browsing around the forum for a little while and scavenging the internet - I am unable to find a one stop shop resource for the maximum IPSec tunnel count on CISCO Routers. I see some answers here and there about a specific...
Hello Community, so after doing a little bit more testing and research I just realized the answer was much simpler and it's a resounding NO - VxLAN as a protocol does not seem to have any fragment ID's in it's overhead fields - there is 1 byte that i...
Hi Flavio thank you, I know that in traditional network design this is the optimal way to go, unfortunately I am working on a network (to be more specific a satellite network/DVB-RCS) which has Modulators and Demodulators that UNFORTUNATELY do not al...
Hi, I was looking for another issue and stumbled upon this one ... probably already resolved but I have a feeling the Access List is the bottle neck ... you have chosen specific SRC and DST IP Addresses which means that only packets with SRC 1.1.1.1 ...
Hi again Giuseppe seems like you are the main responder on my questions Thanks for that. I tried all kinds of combinations, ip pim passive works fine as well because I have it set up further upstream (closer to the multicast source) and it does t...
Hi Giuseppe, thank you for the reply. Yes I have learned about selective QinQ as well at some point but it was not quiet what I was looking for and after further digging around I figured maybe some experts on here might have some other ideas I gues...
