Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello,Does anyone know if the N7K supports transparent layer 2 tunneling of control traffic (CDP, STP and VTP) over EoMPLS? I'm unable to find exact info about this in Cisco's documentation.Here's the problem I'm having:I have an EoMPLS virtual conne...
Hi,I'm facing kind of weird behaviour on a Cisco PIX 515E firewall that I don't understand. I hope someone can explain this:I have a server on the inside interface of the firewall. I have set an access list on the outside interface to define rules fo...
Hi,I wonder if anyone was able to find any kind of reference or document for the CLI equivalent commands for the GUI smartport roles on the cisco catalyst 500 express switch? I have searched a lot but didn't find anything.Thanks in advance,
Hi,Let's suppose that we have the following crypto map policy on a PIX firewall:crypto map VPN-CRYPTO-MAP 10 match address L2L-TUNNEL-01crypto map VPN-CRYPTO-MAP 10 set peer 1.1.1.1crypto map VPN-CRYPTO-MAP 10 set transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5crypto map...
Hi,Is it possible to configure the CSS to route traffic based on the source IP address (PBR lets say). I need to route traffic for different vlans behind the CSS to different gateways when replying to clients' web requests.Thanks in advance.
Hi,Well yes of course. I telnet the public IP address of the server which in turn is staticaly NATed on the firewall and this works fine. I really can't post the whole configuration as it includes huge number of access lists lines (which also include...
Hi,I think posting the output of the "show access-list" command is going to be somehow hard as is it includes around 700 lines. But please let me know if some more specific information may be useful for you or if you are suspecting a particular issue...
Hi,Suppose the following addressing:Your HRSP virtual router: x.x.x.2 255.255.255.248Your ISP router: x.x.x.1 255.255.255.252The ISP can keep their subnet mask as it is since they need only to speak to x.x.x.2 (and the subnet mask of 255.255.255.252 ...
Hi,Yes it's much clearer now. Keep in mind that although you're implementing a two router scenario for higher availability, the design isn't that strong since you have the switch as a single point of failure. The correct thing to do for such cases is...
