01-09-2012 03:34 PM
I want to be sure if this is an working configuration:
"local site"
Int vlan x
description ** inside **
ip address 192.168.2.0/24
!
object network inside-local-network
subnet 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
!
object network inside-sslvpn-network
subnet 192.168.50.96 255.255.255.224
!
object network remote-network
subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
!
nat (inside,outside) source static any any destination static inside-sslvpn-network inside-sslvpn-network
!
nat (inside,outside) source static inside-local-network inside-local-network destination static remote_network remote_network
nat (inside,outside) source static inside-local-network inside-local-network destination static inside-sslvpn-network inside-sslvpn-network
!
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
i am using "split_ACL" as well:
access-list split extended permit ip object inside-local-network object inside-sslvpn-network
access-list split extended permit ip object inside-local-network object remote-network
****************************************************************************************************************************************
"remote site"
Int vlan x
description ** inside **
ip address 192.168.1.1/24
!
object network inside-local-network
subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
!
object network inside-sslvpn-network
subnet 192.168.50.96 255.255.255.224
!
object network remote-network
subnet 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
!
nat (inside,outside) source static any any destination static inside-sslvpn-network inside-sslvpn-network
!
nat (inside,outside) source static inside-local-network inside-local-network destination static remote_network remote_network
nat (inside,outside) source static inside-local-network inside-local-network destination static inside-sslvpn-network
inside-sslvpn-network
!
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
access-list split extended permit ip object inside-local-network object inside-sslvpn-network
access-list split extended permit ip object inside-local-network object remote-network
Am doing something wrong here guys?
01-09-2012 03:42 PM
Maybe I have just been unclear on my previous comment
Thre remote users are connting via AnyConnect to "local site" and want to access resources on "remote site"
01-09-2012 08:09 PM
Hello Vucko,
I mean if what you are looking is to evaluate if each of the ASA´s has the right nat statements for the users to use the anyconnect client and get natted properly: yes, the nat looks good
.
You also have the rules to allowt traffic being generated behind the same interface...
Let me know if this is what you want to accomplish,
Regards,
Julio
01-10-2012 02:00 AM
thank for your help so far Julio!
I don't really understand well what you exactly mean with "generating rules to allowt traffic being generated behind the same interface..."
how should those rules looked like ?
/S
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide