11-12-2010 06:41 AM
Hi,
I'm new im this forum.
I Implemented an Site-to-Site VPN With 2 Ciscos 877.
SITE A:
Public IP Adreess: Static
Internal IP Adrees: 192.168.0.XXX
Mask: 255.255.255.0
SITE B:
Public IP Adreess: Dynamic
Internal IP Adress: 192.168.2.XXX
Mask: 255.255.255.0
I manage to ping on both sides, but i cant access files shares, and could rdp on any server on site A, by Internal IP.
In attach, is the SITE A and SITE B startup configs.
Could please some one help me?
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-15-2010 08:58 AM
Hi Marcos,
Really glad to know the issue is resolved. there is no need to apologise. Please mark this post as answered if there is nothing more.
Rregards,
Prapanch
11-12-2010 06:42 AM
What i'm doing wrong for this VPN dosent work correctly?
Thanks,
MP
11-12-2010 07:26 PM
Hi Marcos,
Your config seems ok. From where to where are you trying to RDP? For the static NATs you have configured on either side, please add the route map command the end and see if it helps:
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 1494 interface Dialer0 1494 route-map SDM_RMAP_1
.
.
.
Please change the static to the above format on Site A and Site B. Let me know how it goes!!
Thanks and Regards,
Prapanch
11-13-2010 02:56 AM
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
On SITE A ( Head Office ), i have 2 Server's: 192.168.0.1 | 192.168.0.2. The first is a Windows 2003 AD|DNS|DHCP|File Server. The Second is a Application Server, that i have to do RDP to it.
Sou, i'm trying to RDP From SITE B ( Branch Office ) to SITE A.
Ex:
From: 192.168.2.1 TO 192.168.0.2 : 3389
I cant do RDP from SITE B to SITE A.
Another interesting thing, from SITEA to SITEB or SITEB to SITEA i cannot telnet the internal interfaces off the router's.
Ex:
From: 192.168.0.254
leiria#telnet 192.168.2.254
Trying 192.168.2.254 ...
% Connection timed out; remote host not responding
From: 192.168.2.254
bpn-matosinhos#telnet 192.168.0.254
Trying 192.168.0.254 ...
% Connection timed out; remote host not responding
From what i understand, you are asking me to put the ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 1494 interface Dialer0 1494 route-map SDM_RMAP_1 on SITEB, correc? Do i have to put some nat in the SITEA?
Sincerely,
Marcos Pinto
11-13-2010 04:23 AM
Hi Marcos,
So here's your current static NAT config on both sites:
SITE A:
======
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 1494 interface Dialer0 1494
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.2 3389 interface Dialer0 3389
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 80 interface Dialer0 80
SITE B:
======
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.254 80 interface Dialer0 80
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.254 443 interface Dialer0 443
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.254 22 interface Dialer0 22
You will have to remove the above statics and modify them to look like below:
SITE A:
======
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 1494 interface Dialer0 1494 route-map SDM_RMAP_1
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.2 3389 interface Dialer0 3389 route-map SDM_RMAP_1
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 80 interface Dialer0 80 route-map SDM_RMAP_1
SITE B:
======
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.254 80 interface Dialer0 80 route-map SDM_RMAP_1
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.254 443 interface Dialer0 443 route-map SDM_RMAP_1
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.254 22 interface Dialer0 22 route-map SDM_RMAP_1
Please note the route-map that we are adding at the end of each "static". This is needed because we do not want traffic to be passed through VPN to be NATed. Hope that clears things out.
Let me know how it goes!!
Thanks and Regards,
Prapanch
11-15-2010 01:52 AM
Hi Prapanch,
Thanks for your reply.
In SITE A i tried to do the following command, and it gave me the following message:
leiria(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 1494 interface Dialer0 1494 route-map SDM_RMAP_1
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
On SITE B the same:
bpn-matosinhos(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.254 80 interface Dialer0 80 route-map SDM_RMAP_1
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Now i'm stuck on this, i can understand why this command cannot work...
Coul you please help me again?
Sincerely,
Marcos Pinto
11-15-2010 06:41 AM
Hi,
I am not sure why that is the case. What version are you running on the routers? Also, try using "?" and check the options as you type the command out.
Another thing you could try is to use the IP address of the Dialer0 interface instead of the "interface Dialer0" keyword and see if the command is taken then. Let me know how it goes!!
Regards,
Prapanch
11-15-2010 06:55 AM
Hi,
I just have Statip Public IP on SITE A, on SITE B is an ADSL Dynamic IP Connection.
So, in SITE A, I do the Following Comand, and did Work:
leiria(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 80 83.240.167.218 80 ?
extendable Extend this translation when used
mapping-id Associate a mapping id to this mapping
no-alias Do not create an alias for the global address
no-payload No translation of embedded address/port in the payload
redundancy NAT redundancy operation
route-map Specify route-map
vrf Specify vrf
leiria(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.1 80 83.240.167.218 80 route-map SDM_RMPA_1
-- This Command work correctly, and I correct them for the other 2 ip nat's that i have.
In SITE B i delete all NAT, except this one:
bpn-matosinhos#ip nat inside source route-map SDM_RMAP_1 interface Dialer0 overload
SITE A IOS: 12.4(15)T7
SITE B IOS: 12.4(15)T13
I'm really stuck on this one.
One question, VPN is OK, anda I could Ping on both SITES all the Active IP's, but on CLI interface ( ssh ), of each router, i cannot do TELNET, ex: From SITE A i cannot telnet 192.168.2.254, and from SITE B i cannot telnet 192.168.0.254. Is there any explanation for that? The VPN is active anda i ping this interfaces.
It seems to me, that only ICMP is active.
Another thing, im my access list, i only have permit ip. Is this correct? Do i need to permit something else, ligue TCP, ou UDP for these networks?
I could'n figured out, what ist the problem of my conf.
Please, help me
Sincerely,
Marcos Pinto
11-15-2010 07:16 AM
Hi Marcos,
The issue according to me seems to be with the statics. I do not hav a lot of experience with routers and NAT commands on them and hence i am not sure of a way to work around this limitation.
Let's see if someone can help us out here or please try posting a question about this in the appropriate discussion forum and see if you get a response!!
Also, what about access to the servers on the SiteA? Is it working now from clients on the Site B?
regards,R
Prapanch
11-15-2010 07:29 AM
Hi,
From SITE B i could not access anithing of the SITE A. The only thing that i can do is PING the active IP's on SITE A from SITE B. Nothing else.
I', really stuck on this ...
11-15-2010 07:56 AM
Hi,
So from SiteB, what happens when you try opening a connection "telnet 192.168.0.2 3389", does it just time out? Please post the output of "show ip nat trans | in 192.168.0.2" from both the routers when trying this connection.
Regards,
Prapanch
11-15-2010 08:32 AM
Hi,
So from SITE A:
leiria#show ip nat trans | in 192.168.0.2
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 2.82.214.85:3143 2.82.214.85:3143
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 2.82.214.85:3267 2.82.214.85:3267
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 2.82.214.85:3480 2.82.214.85:3480
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 83.240.181.168:1538 83.240.181.168:1538
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 83.240.181.168:1703 83.240.181.168:1703
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 83.240.181.168:4156 83.240.181.168:4156
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:15509 212.45.52.30:15509
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:15576 212.45.52.30:15576
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:15648 212.45.52.30:15648
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:15716 212.45.52.30:15716
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:15783 212.45.52.30:15783
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:15851 212.45.52.30:15851
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:15919 212.45.52.30:15919
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:15987 212.45.52.30:15987
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16050 212.45.52.30:16050
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16110 212.45.52.30:16110
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16178 212.45.52.30:16178
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16246 212.45.52.30:16246
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16305 212.45.52.30:16305
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16371 212.45.52.30:16371
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16435 212.45.52.30:16435
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16497 212.45.52.30:16497
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16564 212.45.52.30:16564
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16627 212.45.52.30:16627
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16693 212.45.52.30:16693
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16763 212.45.52.30:16763
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16826 212.45.52.30:16826
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16883 212.45.52.30:16883
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:16952 212.45.52.30:16952
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17014 212.45.52.30:17014
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17077 212.45.52.30:17077
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17135 212.45.52.30:17135
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17204 212.45.52.30:17204
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17270 212.45.52.30:17270
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17336 212.45.52.30:17336
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17402 212.45.52.30:17402
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17466 212.45.52.30:17466
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17534 212.45.52.30:17534
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17592 212.45.52.30:17592
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17664 212.45.52.30:17664
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17727 212.45.52.30:17727
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17797 212.45.52.30:17797
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17859 212.45.52.30:17859
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:17938 212.45.52.30:17938
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:18020 212.45.52.30:18020
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:18085 212.45.52.30:18085
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:18148 212.45.52.30:18148
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:18218 212.45.52.30:18218
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:18293 212.45.52.30:18293
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:18349 212.45.52.30:18349
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 212.45.52.30:18425 212.45.52.30:18425
tcp 83.240.167.218:1091 192.168.0.20:1091 64.4.61.134:1863 64.4.61.134:1863
tcp 83.240.167.218:1099 192.168.0.21:1099 64.4.34.84:1863 64.4.34.84:1863
tcp 83.240.167.218:2503 192.168.0.21:2503 94.127.74.120:80 94.127.74.120:80
tcp 83.240.167.218:2503 192.168.0.21:2503 192.0.2.43:9518 192.0.2.43:9518
tcp 83.240.167.218:1101 192.168.0.23:1101 207.46.125.55:1863 207.46.125.55:1863
tcp 83.240.167.218:1156 192.168.0.23:1156 193.53.22.38:443 193.53.22.38:443
tcp 83.240.167.218:1211 192.168.0.23:1211 193.53.22.38:443 193.53.22.38:443
tcp 83.240.167.218:1212 192.168.0.23:1212 193.53.22.38:80 193.53.22.38:80
tcp 83.240.167.218:1213 192.168.0.23:1213 193.53.22.38:80 193.53.22.38:80
tcp 83.240.167.218:1214 192.168.0.23:1214 193.53.22.38:443 193.53.22.38:443
tcp 83.240.167.218:2733 192.168.0.27:2733 64.4.61.85:1863 64.4.61.85:1863
tcp 83.240.167.218:4758 192.168.0.27:4758 195.200.38.136:80 195.200.38.136:80
tcp 83.240.167.218:4760 192.168.0.27:4760 195.200.38.136:80 195.200.38.136:80
tcp 83.240.167.218:4761 192.168.0.27:4761 195.200.38.136:80 195.200.38.136:80
tcp 83.240.167.218:4762 192.168.0.27:4762 195.200.38.136:80 195.200.38.136:80
tcp 83.240.167.218:4763 192.168.0.27:4763 195.200.38.136:80 195.200.38.136:80
tcp 83.240.167.218:4764 192.168.0.27:4764 195.200.38.136:80 195.200.38.136:80
tcp 83.240.167.218:4765 192.168.0.27:4765 195.200.38.136:80 195.200.38.136:80
udp 83.240.167.218:123 192.168.0.250:123 81.92.212.46:123 81.92.212.46:123
udp 83.240.167.218:123 192.168.0.250:123 84.90.94.144:123 84.90.94.144:123
udp 83.240.167.218:123 192.168.0.250:123 195.22.17.7:123 195.22.17.7:123
tcp 83.240.167.218:1033 192.168.0.250:1174 82.102.10.221:25 82.102.10.221:25
tcp 83.240.167.218:1032 192.168.0.250:1723 82.102.10.221:25 82.102.10.221:25
tcp 83.240.167.218:1059 192.168.0.250:59271 82.102.10.221:25 82.102.10.221:25
tcp 83.240.167.218:1075 192.168.0.250:59344 82.102.10.221:25 82.102.10.221:25
tcp 83.240.167.218:3389 192.168.0.2:3389 --- ---
When a try to telnet from SITE B to SITE A, it gave me the following message ( i'm doing from a XP Machine IP: 192.168.2.10 ):
C:\Documents and Settings\Admin>telnet 192.168.0.2 3389
A ligar a 192.168.0.2...Não foi possível abrir uma para o anfitrião, na porta 33
89: A ligação falhou
From the same machine ( IP: 192.168.2.10 ) i do a telnet 192.168.0.254 with sucess, i can manage to work in the Router's CLI from SITE A.
I dont understand is why i cannot access file shares on server's 192.168.0.1|192.168.0.2 from SITE B so SITE A.
11-15-2010 08:38 AM
Hi,
I do not see 192.168.2.10 in the output below. Was this taken when you tried the telnet? Also, please post the message you get in english. dint quite understand what it meant there.
regards,
prapanch
11-15-2010 08:53 AM
Hi,
It's working. The problem is not from the VPN Cisco's 877.
In this infraestructure, there is an Untagle Bridge Equipament, there is blocking all the comunication's, ecept ICMP, for what i understud.
I desconect the untangle machine and now all is working just fine.
Prapanch, thank you very very mutch, and realy sorry for all your time spend on me problem. The fact is that i didn't know that there is an Untangle machine in this infra-estruture, and there so, saw the problem reside in the Cisco VPN.
Mutch muth thanks, for all your effort to solve my probem.
Once again, i'm sorry for all the inconvenience,
Sincerely
Marcos Pinto
11-15-2010 08:58 AM
Hi Marcos,
Really glad to know the issue is resolved. there is no need to apologise. Please mark this post as answered if there is nothing more.
Rregards,
Prapanch
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide