03-26-2008 04:16 AM
Hi,
we had a working IPSEC VPN between IOS Router and Checkpoint FW. Now, after adding host entries to the ACL we got "no proposal chosen".
My question:
=> Can we use more than one entry in a ACL attached to crypto map? <=
Like this for example:
access-list 125 permit ip 172.17.17.160 0.0.0.31 4.72.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 125 permit ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 4.72.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 125 permit ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 host 4.14.6.243
access-list 125 permit ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 host 4.50.50.4
access-list 125 permit ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 host 4.26.13.5
...
Greetings Richi
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-26-2008 06:15 AM
Hi Richi,
Yes you can use more than one entry in that ACL, but the ACL should be symmetric on the other side of the VPN.
So for example
access-list 125 permit ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 host 4.26.13.5
should be on the other side:
access-list 125 permit ip host 4.26.13.5 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31
Have you checked that you have the symmetric access lists?
Hope it helps,
Paulo
03-26-2008 06:15 AM
Hi Richi,
Yes you can use more than one entry in that ACL, but the ACL should be symmetric on the other side of the VPN.
So for example
access-list 125 permit ip 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31 host 4.26.13.5
should be on the other side:
access-list 125 permit ip host 4.26.13.5 172.17.18.0 0.0.0.31
Have you checked that you have the symmetric access lists?
Hope it helps,
Paulo
03-26-2008 07:02 AM
We found a solution / workaround:
The order of the Cisco ACL was clear, but not from Checkpoint side. So we built up the new encryption domains step by step.
=> after every entry (same network / host object, of course symmetric) we checked the IPSec tunnel
Now are all entries done and tunnel is still active.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide