08-01-2014 12:46 AM - edited 02-21-2020 07:45 PM
Hello!
I'm testing flexvpn environment.
As I heard dmvpn provides traffic through hub if connection between spokes is not possible for some reason (let's say routing problems).
So I created:
hub with address 192.168.42.150
spoke - 192.168.42.151, announce 192.168.1.1
and spoke2 - 192.168.42.150, 192.168.2.1
Everything is OK, spokes build virtual-access to each other :-)
But if I deny access from spoke to spoke by access-list with deny of 192.168.42.151 on spoke2 ,
then first several packets pass through hub and then stops.
Routing shows that packets should go to hub, I can ping both spokes (192.168.1.1 and 1.2) from hub, but not each other.
Even if I remove access-list it doesn't help until spoke with access list reload.
Is this expected or... ?
Thank you!
08-01-2014 12:57 AM
btw, what is more interesting- I see virtual-access interfaces on spokes with source and destination addresses of spokes, but (!) there is no ike2 between them , so traffic shall not pass (c) ;-)
08-01-2014 03:33 AM
OK,
clear ip nhrp shortcut
on both spokes
solves problem, i.e. I can ping one spoke through hub after I apply access-list.
But after some timeout it doesn't work again.
How can I avoid this behaviour?
There is no real tunnel, but router send traffic into it...
Thank you!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide