cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
335
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Implementation doubt in a VPN between a VPN3005 and a Cisco 827 router

pferraz
Level 1
Level 1

Picture this:

Have to establish a VPN tunnel between the HQ (VPN3005) and a branch office (827). Only need to pass IP data in the tunnel and both sites must reach the resources on the other, that means I don't want any NAT involved.

Can anyone tell me what's the best/simple way to do this?

Can it be implemented with Cisco Easy VPN ? (or not, because of don't wanting to do any kind of NAT)

Thanks in advance!

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

ajagadee
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

I would prefer a Lan to Lan VPN Tunnel. I have enclosed a couple of URL that

explains setting up Lan to Lan IPSec tunnel in different scenarios:

1. with the Router having a static routable ip address

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ALTIGAR.shtml

2. with the router is assigned an ip address via DHCP.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn3k_iosdhcp.html

Regards,

Arul

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

ajagadee
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

I would prefer a Lan to Lan VPN Tunnel. I have enclosed a couple of URL that

explains setting up Lan to Lan IPSec tunnel in different scenarios:

1. with the Router having a static routable ip address

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ALTIGAR.shtml

2. with the router is assigned an ip address via DHCP.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn3k_iosdhcp.html

Regards,

Arul