11-08-2010 06:00 AM - edited 02-21-2020 04:57 PM
Alright, so just as a sanity check, I've got a question for the group. When configuring the crypto acls that define interesting traffic for a tunnel, are we able to use summaries?
So lets say site B is 10.5.10.0/24 and site A can be summarized with 10.10.0.0/16. Is it acceptable to write something like below for the crypto acl?
access-list 101 permit ip 10.5.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
Site A would have the following networks
10.10.0.0/24
10.10.1.0/24
etc.
Then on head end device, the the acls would be:
access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.5.10.0 0.0.0.255
Thanks for any feedback!
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-08-2010 06:29 AM
Hi There,
Yes, that's perfectly fine.
As long as we have routes configured properly, nothing should stand in your way from configuring the acl's like that.
Regards,
Praveen
11-08-2010 06:29 AM
Hi There,
Yes, that's perfectly fine.
As long as we have routes configured properly, nothing should stand in your way from configuring the acl's like that.
Regards,
Praveen
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide