Routing between VRF and GRT to Core Layer. Dual-Hub Dual-ISP
I'm having issues in routing from vrf to grt ( global routing table ) to the core router and vice versa.
Here's a quick overview of my setup:
HUB1: Primary for RED
HUB2: Primary for BLUE
iVRF: RED and BLUE
fVRF: ISP1 and ISP2
Hub to Core: 10.250.250.0/24
T0: 192.168.100.1 tunnel vrf isp1 - RED
T1: 192.168.101.1 tunnel vrf isp1 - BLUE
T2: 192.168.200.1 tunnel vrf isp2 - RED
T3: 192.168.201.1 tunnel vrf isp2 - BLUE
2 Tunnels always remain shutdown at the spokes, but whenever the connections fails at one of the ISP's, the spoke automatically shuts down the corresponding tunnel and brings up the Backup tunnel which registers through ISP2, but at the Hub1.
My setup is in the following order:
What I want to achieve is, I want to be able to access the VRF's from my core router, without involving anymore VRF's down the core layer.I want to terminate the VRF at the Hub's, and continue with normal routing below the Hub's without having too much routes on my Core routers , I want to advertise a summary route from the Hub's down to my Core routers ( Each Hub will advertise 2 Routers, for example Hub1 will advertise 10.100.x.x as its primary route, and possible 10.105.x.x as a secondary route , in the case if Hub2 fails ).
The only way to achieve this , it seems that the Spokes, Hub and the Core router need to know about each other in their GRT, otherwise it won't route.
I tried Route leaking from VRF to GRT, but it didn't go as expected.
I could easily redistribute static routes for my Tunnel interfaces to my core layer, and my core routers would always be able to access the Tunnel interfaces, because they all reside in a different Subnet, and they are static and never change their way, but as for RED and BLUE, if one ISP goes down at the spoke, the Spoke would switch to the other Tunnel, and the Hub would still be routing through the old tunnel because it doesn't know the spoke changed his way.That is for static route distributing to the core ,its too dynamic to go with static routes.
Here's a link to an example of what i'm doing, with a few changes:
With the enhancements in ISE 3.0 for integrating with Azure AD via SAML IdP, it is now possible to leverage Microsoft Single Sign-On for multiple ISE Portals (for example Sponsor and Guest/BYOD Portals).
At the time of this writing, ISE cann...
With the enhancements in ISE 3.0 for integrating with Azure AD via SAML IdP, it is now possible to create a BYOD Flow to provide Wireless network access using an employee’s Azure AD credentials.
The table below shows the whole Cisco Security solutions + Splunk integrations add-ons. Kindly let me know if I have missed some add-ons or if there are any new updates. Thank you!
Hope this will be helpful for everyone who is looking for Splunk in...
A python based script to generate report if there are disabled rules under an Access Control Policy and an option to delete those rules in bulk.
Step 1 Download the script on PCStep 2 Make sure python3 is installed on PC and have reach...
A python based script to generate report if there are double logging on FMC ACP (logging at beginning and end), having rule action "Allow" or "Trust". (Option1 )
Also, the logging at the begging will be disabled if logging is detected for both beginning ...