11-17-2016 06:37 AM
I have a 5512 in a datacenter and a 5505 at an office. I've got a site to site that is connecting but looking at the session in monitoring its showing one way traffic. i've tried recreating the site to site multiple times. I've also combed through and removed anything that was related to the site to site (network objects and any left over entries) before recreating the site to site but still have one way traffic. any help would be appreciated.
The site to site i'm having issues with is the one to 209.221.9.34, inside range is 10.2.13.0/24
Local network is inside 192.168.34.10/24
11-17-2016 04:56 PM
Would you post the output of show route and perhaps the output of an attempt to traceroute to some address in 10.2.13.0? I would like to verify that the traffic does use the Windstream interface for those destinations.
HTH
Rick
11-19-2016 09:33 AM
11-20-2016 10:44 AM
Thanks for the information. I have checked the config and do not see an issue that would explain the symptoms that you describe. Would you post the output of the command
show crypto IPsec sa peer 209.221.9.34
And can you confirm that the inside network has a correct route for 10.2.13.0 that forwards it to your ASA?
HTH
Rick
11-21-2016 05:14 AM
11-21-2016 05:39 AM
Thank you for the output of show crypto IPsec sa peer. Can you confirm that your inside network has a route for the 10.2.13.0 network? Can you post the output of an attempt from a device in your inside network to traceroute (or tracert for Windows) to an address in the 10.2.13.0 network?
HTH
Rick
11-21-2016 06:40 AM
11-21-2016 07:56 AM
Since I do not know the topology of your network it is difficult to know specifically how to ask. But let me try it this way:
- what is the default gateway for the PC from which you did the tracert?
- on that device that is the default gateway for your PC does its route table have an entry for 10.2.13.0?
HTH
Rick
11-21-2016 08:39 AM
the default gateway for the network is the ASA 5505 (192.168.34.1)
The only place I can find the 10.2.13.0 is in the NAT Rules. It specifies all traffic coming from 192.168.34.0/24 to 10.2.13.0/24 NAT to outside-winstream. This is the same for 2 other site to sites we have and they are sending just fine.
11-21-2016 11:16 AM
Two more things to try.
- would you post the output of route print from your PC?
- would you enable logging buffered and provide a decent size buffer for the data. Then make another attempt to access the 10.2.13.0 network. Then look in the logs and see what references there might be for 10.2.13. I am hoping for some verification whether the ASA sees traffic toward 10.2.13 and if so what the ASA says it is doing with that attempt.
HTH
Rick
11-21-2016 11:16 AM
11-21-2016 11:46 AM
I did a little test and extended the site to site to include my DNS servers for my company. They are on a different interface and are in the range of 217.31.217.0/24
I added just 172.31.217.10 and 172.31.217.11. after I adjusted the NAT rules to allow that interface to talk to my 192.168.34.0 network from my ASA 5512, traffic was flowing between those, but still unable to communicate through the same site to site between 10.2.13.0 and 192.168.34.0.
11-22-2016 09:02 AM
Thank you for the additional test. It is interesting and perhaps a bit puzzling. It is good to know that if you add the DNS servers to the traffic to be processed by the VPN that the DNS server traffic does go normally through the VPN. That shows that the VPN config does work. And it seems to say that there is something about the 10.2.13.0 network that is different. I do not see anything in what you have posted from the PC that would impact this network, and we do not see anything in the ASA config that would impact it. So it leaves me wondering what and where it could be.
Can you tell me about your PC connection. Does it connect directly to the ASA or does it connect to some other device that connects to the ASA?
HTH
Rick
11-28-2016 08:44 AM
Sorry about the delayed reply, Holiday.
We go from the Cisco ASA 5505 to a Cisco SG500-52P Stacked with a SG500-52.
each server/computer connects to a single port in the stack.
there are no extra switches between computers and the stack.
11-28-2016 08:59 AM
Thanks for the update. I understand the impact of holidays on our other activities.
Is there any possibility that something in the stack has any logic that impacts 10.2.13.0?
HTH
Rick
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide