04-29-2013 03:31 AM
Hi All,
I've configured a S2S VPN and created the ACL for the "interesting traffic".
So, on my VPN router, do I need another access list - or if I try to reach the "interesting" subnets is the Crypto ACL automatically called/used? I've done all the crypto stuff but unsure as what is required ACL wise, ontop of my "interesting" ACL.
If I do a trace to one of my "interesting" subnets, it looks to be going through my default gateway, instead of trying to use the PEER address.
Am I missing something?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-01-2013 12:43 AM
Ok..when running debugs now I am getting the following.. When I ping or trace to a host on the remote site, the debug output is below or part of it.. What does this indicate? I've removed the IPs.
Thanks
*May 1 07:54:56.856: ISAKMP (0:4012): received packet from x.x.x.x dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
*May 1 07:54:56.856: ISAKMP:(4012): processing ID payload. message ID = 0
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP (0:4012): ID payload
next-payload : 8
type : 1
address : x.x.x.x
protocol : 17
port : 500
length : 12
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP:(0):: peer matches *none* of the profiles
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP:(4012): processing HASH payload. message ID = 0
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP:received payload type 17
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP:(4012): processing vendor id payload
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP:(4012): vendor ID is DPD
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP:(4012):SA authentication status:
authenticated
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP:(4012):SA has been authenticated with x.x.x.x
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP: Trying to insert a peer y.y.y.y/x.x.x.x/500/, and inserted successfully 469153FC.
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP:(4012):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP:(4012):Old State = IKE_I_MM5 New State = IKE_I_MM6
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP (0:4012): received packet from x.x.x.x dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
*May 1 07:54:56.860: ISAKMP: set new node 1409855149 to QM_IDLE
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012): processing HASH payload. message ID = 1409855149
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012): processing NOTIFY RESPONDER_LIFETIME protocol 1
spi 0, message ID = 1409855149, sa = 47997E20
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012):SA authentication status:
authenticated
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012): processing responder lifetime
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012): start processing isakmp responder lifetime
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012): restart ike sa timer to 3600 secs
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012):deleting node 1409855149 error FALSE reason "Informational (in) state 1"
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012):Old State = IKE_I_MM6 New State = IKE_I_MM6
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
*May 1 07:54:56.864: ISAKMP:(4012):Old State = IKE_I_MM6 New State = IKE_I_MM6
*May 1 07:54:56.868: ISAKMP:(4012):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
*May 1 07:54:56.868: ISAKMP:(4012):Old State = IKE_I_MM6 New State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
*May 1 07:54:56.868: ISAKMP:(4012):beginning Quick Mode exchange, M-ID of -415089130
*May 1 07:54:56.868: ISAKMP:(4012):QM Initiator gets spi
*May 1 07:54:56.872: ISAKMP:(4012): sending packet to x.x.x.x my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE
*May 1 07:54:56.872: ISAKMP:(4012):Node -415089130, Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_INIT_QM
*May 1 07:54:56.872: ISAKMP:(4012):Old State = IKE_QM_READY New State = IKE_QM_I_QM1
*May 1 07:54:56.872: ISAKMP:(4012):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE
*May 1 07:54:56.872: ISAKMP:(4012):Old State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE New State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
*May 1 07:54:56.908: ISAKMP (0:4012): received packet from x.x.x.x dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) QM_IDLE
*May 1 07:54:56.908: ISAKMP: set new node 575568488 to QM_IDLE
*May 1 07:54:56.912: ISAKMP:(4012): processing HASH payload. message ID = 575568488
*May 1 07:54:56.912: ISAKMP:(4012): processing NOTIFY INVALID_ID_INFO protocol 1
spi 0, message ID = 575568488, sa = 47997E20
*May 1 07:54:56.912: ISAKMP:(4012):peer does not do paranoid keepalives.
*May 1 07:54:56.912: ISAKMP:(4012):deleting SA reason "Recevied fatal informational" state (I) QM_IDLE (peer x.x.x.x)
*May 1 07:54:56.912: ISAKMP:(4012):deleting node 575568488 error FALSE reason "Informational (in) state 1"
*May 1 07:54:56.912: ISAKMP:(4012):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY
*May 1 07:54:56.912: ISAKMP:(4012):Old State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE New State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
*May 1 07:54:56.912: ISAKMP (0:4012): received packet from x.x.x.x dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) QM_IDLE
*May 1 07:54:56.916: ISAKMP: set new node -1143564129 to QM_IDLE
*May 1 07:54:56.916: ISAKMP:(4012): sending packet to x.x.x.x my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP:(4012):purging node -1143564129
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP:(4012):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP:(4012):Old State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE New State = IKE_DEST_SA
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP:(4012):deleting SA reason "No reason" state (I) QM_IDLE (peer x.x.x.x)
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP:(0):Can't decrement IKE Call Admission Control stat outgoing_active since it's already 0.
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP: Unlocking peer struct 0x469153FC for isadb_mark_sa_deleted(), count 0
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP: Deleting peer node by peer_reap for x.x.x.x: 469153FC
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP:(4012):deleting node -415089130 error FALSE reason "IKE deleted"
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP:(4012):deleting node 1409855149 error FALSE reason "IKE deleted"
*May 1 07:54:56.920: ISAKMP:(4012):deleting node 575568488 error FALSE reason "IKE deleted"
*May 1 07:54:56.924: ISAKMP:(4012):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
*May 1 07:54:56.924: ISAKMP:(4012):Old State = IKE_DEST_SA New State = IKE_DEST_SA
05-01-2013 01:04 AM
Also, looking at my access-list - it shows 108 matched after pingin tests. I get no reply though. Does this suggest return path is no good on remote end?
Extended IP access list VPN-INTERESTING-TRAFFIC
10 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 20.20.20.0 0.0.0.255 (108 matches)
05-01-2013 01:37 AM
Now working ok...Was an ACL on remote side.
Thanks for help all!
05-01-2013 02:00 AM
Great to hear that you managed to make it works!! don't forget to mark this post as answered so that other people know that it has been solved.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide