cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
689
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

VPN issue

craigmc24
Community Member

have what would appear to be a simple lan to lan vpn.

I have enabled: sysopt connection permit-ipsec.

The remote site works as expected - without the use of any access-list assigned to the inside interface for vpn traffic.

The local site will not operate unless I have a crypto access-list and an access-list assigned to the inside interface.

example:

local:

access-list inside extended permit ip 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0

!

access-list cryto_acl extnded permit ip 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0

!

access-list no_nat permit ip 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0

!

nat (inside) 0 access-list no_nat

!

access-group inside in interface inside

!

remote:

access-list crypto_acl extended permit ip 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

!

access-list no_nat permit ip 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

!

nat (inside) 0 access-list no_nat

!

When both access-lists do not exist at the local site it is not possible to connect to the remote site!!

does anyone have any ideas?!

thanks

1 Reply 1

ajagadee
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Craig,

The "sysopt connection permit-ipsec" is for rules to be bypassed for ipsec traffic on the outside interface.

In your local pix configuration, you have applied your access-list on the inside interface - "access-group inside in interface inside".

By default the pix will allow all traffic on the inside interface (security level 100) unless explicitly denied by an Access-List. Since you have access-group applied on the inside interface, you have to explicitly permit the local and remote network.

Please let me know if this answers your questions.

I hope it helps.

Regards,

Arul