07-02-2024 05:34 AM
CLI agent: Error while processing NVGEN command: ...
There is an impact to the management GUI + we don't know if running configuration is saved, due to the face each save action results in "CLI agent: Error while processing NVGEN command" warnings. How sure are we, that our configuration is intact and correct saved!?
When saving configurations, we see following messages:
% Command 'location algorithm' unsuccessful: feature or system busy
% Command 'location expiry' unsuccessful: feature or system busy
% Command 'location notify-threshold' unsuccessful: feature or system busy
....
Also messages in GUI:
example:
Jul 2 12:26:52.996: %CLI_AGENT-1-NVGEN_ERR: Error while processing NVGEN command: cloud-services
Jul 2 12:26:52.997: %CLI_AGENT-1-NVGEN_TRACEBACK: Traceback: 1#b30f30cb912860428c70b1e72fb10927 ....
07-02-2024 07:48 AM
- You could try to reboot the controller and check if the problem goes away ; (if production permits)
As far as verifying a saved configuration , a trick could be by showing the running config through putty with logging enabled ,
then save it and copy the configuration from flash to an external repository and compare both ,
M.
07-02-2024 04:03 PM - edited 07-02-2024 05:59 PM
@M.Voortmans wrote:
CLI agent: Error while processing NVGEN command
This error message occurs when the WLC is not adhering to the "80% rule" and is overloaded with AP.
C9800 design is no different and, generally, Cisco recommends limiting the load to around 80% of the AP and client scale.
The 80% scale is just a recommendation to start planning the design and deployment of a catalyst wireless network as this is tested and validated number.
For C9800-80, for example, this means 4800 APs and/or around 50k clients. Does this mean that you cannot have six thousand APs on a single C9800-80? No, not really; Cisco has a lot of successful deployments at maximum scale. The 80% scale is just a recommendation to start planning the design and deployment of a catalyst wireless network.
I've had this error message (and subsequent Tracebacks) when our 9800-80 had over 5400 APs. This same error message has also appeared on our 9800-L with 210 APs. Uptime for either WLC is >45 days and we've seen this in 17.9.4, 17.9.5 & 17.12.3.
Do not load the 9800-80 more than 50% or risk a memory leak like below:
9800-80, 17.12.3, 3050 x APs, Uptime: 6 weeks
07-03-2024 12:02 AM
07-03-2024 12:34 AM - edited 07-03-2024 12:35 AM
Is this a 9800-L?
Post the complete output to the following commands:
sh platform resource
sh platform software status con brief
07-03-2024 01:23 AM
07-03-2024 01:21 AM
Hi Leo,
See output, below.
wgtsnlve01#sh platform resource
**State Acronym: H - Healthy, W - Warning, C - Critical
Resource Usage Max Warning Critical State
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RP0 (ok, active) H
Control Processor 11.91% 100% 80% 90% H
DRAM 4729MB(30%) 15467MB 88% 93% H
ESP0(ok, active) H
QFP H
DRAM 174021KB(9%) 1835008KB 85% 95% H
IRAM 207KB(10%) 2048KB 85% 95% H
CPU Utilization 0.00% 100% 90% 95% H
wgtsnlve01# sh platform software status con brief
Load Average
Slot Status 1-Min 5-Min 15-Min
1-RP0 Healthy 1.14 1.18 1.23
2-RP0 Healthy 1.16 1.15 1.16
Memory (kB)
Slot Status Total Used (Pct) Free (Pct) Committed (Pct)
1-RP0 Healthy 15838740 4843796 (31%) 10994944 (69%) 4922096 (31%)
2-RP0 Healthy 15838740 4500504 (28%) 11338236 (72%) 4790256 (30%)
CPU Utilization
Slot CPU User System Nice Idle IRQ SIRQ IOwait
1-RP0 0 2.40 0.80 0.00 96.79 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 4.00 1.40 0.00 94.58 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 2.59 0.79 0.00 96.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.70 0.80 0.00 98.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.60 0.70 0.00 98.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 3.30 0.80 0.00 95.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 0.50 0.60 0.00 98.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 99.80 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 0.10 0.00 0.00 99.89 0.00 0.00 0.00
10 0.19 0.09 0.00 99.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-RP0 0 2.20 3.70 0.00 94.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
1 2.50 3.50 0.00 93.90 0.00 0.10 0.00
2 2.30 3.60 0.00 94.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 0.50 0.70 0.00 98.79 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.30 0.50 0.00 99.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 3.20 0.70 0.00 96.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 0.60 0.60 0.00 98.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 99.80 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8 0.10 0.00 0.00 99.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 0.10 0.10 0.00 99.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
10 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
On this site location, we have very small HA-deployment with 2x C9800-L-C-K9 and 15 AP’s (types: CW9164I-E) .
Best regards,
Marc
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide