04-23-2013 08:53 AM - edited 07-03-2021 11:57 PM
Is there a standard when it comes to addressing the AP's? I have always used static ip's, but was wondering if there are pros or cons to this. Does the size or number of ap's being deployed play a role in the?
TIA,
Eric
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-23-2013 09:01 AM
No advanatges unless you have a need to know what IP addresses your access points have.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"I'm in a serious relationship with my Wi-Fi. You could say we have a connection."
04-23-2013 09:22 AM
I tend to always use statics.... due to my clients wanting to monitor the access points using their current tools. If not, then some have used dhcp mac reservations, but only a few of my installs have been plain dhcp. just my 2 cents. I don't think there is any real pro's or con's though.
Thanks,
Scott
Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"
04-23-2013 09:26 AM
IMHO, DHCP is the way to go. If the AP can't talk to the WLC for some reason it will fall back to DHCP anyway.
I don't enable telnet/ssh to the AP globally anyway, so when I need to access it, I enable per device and can get the IP then.
HTH,
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered
04-23-2013 09:01 AM
No advanatges unless you have a need to know what IP addresses your access points have.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"I'm in a serious relationship with my Wi-Fi. You could say we have a connection."
04-23-2013 09:22 AM
I tend to always use statics.... due to my clients wanting to monitor the access points using their current tools. If not, then some have used dhcp mac reservations, but only a few of my installs have been plain dhcp. just my 2 cents. I don't think there is any real pro's or con's though.
Thanks,
Scott
Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"
04-23-2013 09:26 AM
IMHO, DHCP is the way to go. If the AP can't talk to the WLC for some reason it will fall back to DHCP anyway.
I don't enable telnet/ssh to the AP globally anyway, so when I need to access it, I enable per device and can get the IP then.
HTH,
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered
04-23-2013 11:33 AM
Looks like it is up to wo is installing it. No pros or cons. Thanks! Very fast responses!
04-23-2013 11:45 AM
Well... I stage all the AP's so it's easier for me to create a spreadsheet with the hostname, scan in serial number, mac address, enter ip address and location. I have done large installs that entailed 12 WiSM's and still growing... all with static and small implementations all with static. How I see it is and access point is a network device, so are any of your other network devices using dhcp or even servers configured for dhcp? Clients usually will have some sort of monitoring tool and having an ip change for some wierd reason and the monitoring tool showing a different device is not a good thing. DHCP is easy and is not a bad option.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide