05-07-2021 05:35 AM
Hi Guys,
i am preparing Cisco ACI and VxLAN in ACI.
I am having query for difference between Legacy Nexus VxLAN and ACI VxLAN? Can anyone give best answer?
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-07-2021 06:00 AM
ACI VXLAN (aka iVXLAN) just makes use some of the reserved fields in the VXLAN headers to identify source groups (EPGs) and some other ACI-specific classifiers. You can take a look at this CiscoLive presentation if you want to understand the header differences. https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2019/pdf/BRKACI-3101.pdf
Robert
05-07-2021 02:11 PM
Hi @Noovi ,
If you are asking from an academic point of view - just because you HAVE TO KNOW then I understand your question perfectly - and Robert's answer is a great place to go - particularly slide 20. I've pasted a copy of that slide below for your reference. You could also check out this (now expired) RFC Draft
BUT if you are asking the question because you are worried about any changes you might need to carry existing VXLAN traffic across ACI - then there is no need to worry. The iVXLAN encapsulation is for ACI only, existing VXLAN traffic that needs to be transported over ACI is trasported transparently and no changes need to be made on your part.
05-07-2021 06:00 AM
ACI VXLAN (aka iVXLAN) just makes use some of the reserved fields in the VXLAN headers to identify source groups (EPGs) and some other ACI-specific classifiers. You can take a look at this CiscoLive presentation if you want to understand the header differences. https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/emea/docs/2019/pdf/BRKACI-3101.pdf
Robert
05-07-2021 02:11 PM
Hi @Noovi ,
If you are asking from an academic point of view - just because you HAVE TO KNOW then I understand your question perfectly - and Robert's answer is a great place to go - particularly slide 20. I've pasted a copy of that slide below for your reference. You could also check out this (now expired) RFC Draft
BUT if you are asking the question because you are worried about any changes you might need to carry existing VXLAN traffic across ACI - then there is no need to worry. The iVXLAN encapsulation is for ACI only, existing VXLAN traffic that needs to be transported over ACI is trasported transparently and no changes need to be made on your part.
04-23-2023 07:07 AM - edited 04-23-2023 02:50 PM
Cisco documentation shows the following as the first 16 bits in the ACI VxLAN header. I assume this is outdated information?
GRRRIRRR RDRRARRR
One example of this is https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/us/docs/2019/pdf/BRKDCN-2489.pdf
(Slide 18)
04-23-2023 02:12 PM
Hi @njccnp ,
Not sure if you are adding extra information to the question (which already has an accepted answer) or you are asking a new question.
IF you ARE asking a new question, then please, ask a new question. And include the reference to where you found the diagram. I for one would be very interested to see where you found it.
04-23-2023 02:54 PM
04-23-2023 03:35 PM
Hi @njccnp
You don't need to delete the post. Just create a new one (and maybe once created, edit your original to link to the new question). In the meantime, I'll take a look at the reference.
04-23-2023 03:56 PM
Okay, thanks. Usually the docs with the "RDRRARRR" flags refer to the ACI implementation as "VXLAN GBP," whereas most docs with the "DL,E,SP,DP" flags refer to it as "iVXLAN." However, some docs simply say "VXLAN." My assumption is that the header format changed, and that the term "iVXLAN" refers to the modified specs, while "VXLAN-GBP" is the older term, and refers to older (likely deprecated) specs.
04-24-2023 01:58 PM
Hi @njccnp ,
As much as I hate adding to a dead thread, I guess the following information is relevant to the original question, so here goes:
I
bit, which indicates that the header contains a VXLAN Network Identifier (VNI - or often written as VNID)G
bit (Group bit), which indicated thatD
and A
bits, (D or DL is the "Don't Learn" bit, the A bit indicates that policy has been "Applied") should also be present, as well as a 16 bit Group Policy ID.
iVXLAN
header (the i indicating Insieme - the company that created ACI before it was bought (back) by Cisco. Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide