- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-27-2011 03:25 AM
Hi,
I have a question about how a static entry under a "sticky" performs
Configuring Static IP Address Sticky Table Entries
Cisco Documentation Says When you configure a static entry, the ACE enters it into the sticky table immediately.
Configuring the ACE Action on Server Failure
failaction purge
The purge keyword specifies that the ACE remove the connections to a real server if that real server in the server farm fails after you enter the command. The ACE sends a reset (RST) to both the client and the server that failed.
Cisco Documentation Says If you do not configure this command, the ACE takes no action when a server fails
sample config
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.240 address source STICKY1
timeout 180
replicate sticky
serverfarm SERVERFARM18 static client source 192.168.12.15 rserver SERVER1
Question1 - What happens if SERVER1 fails?
a) Does the ACE let the connections to SERVER1 timeout(default behaviour) and then load-balance new connections coming in deom 192.168.12.15 to another server in SERVERFARM1
OR
b) Does the ACE reset the connections to SERVER1 immediately and starts load-balancing new conenction coming in from 192.168.12.15 to other servers in SERVERFARM1 ?
OR
c) Does the ACE just drop the current and new connections from 192.168.12.15 till SERVER1 comes back up ?
OR
d) Is it dealt differently?
Question2 - Now what happens if the failed server(SERVER1) comes back up after some time?
e) Does the ACE reset any current connections from 192.168.1.15 and starts sending them to SERVER1 ?
OR
f) Does the ACE leave the current connections from 192.168.1.15 to other servers in SERVERFARM1 as they are and send any new connections
from 192.168.1.15 to SERVER1?
OR
g) Is it dealt differently?
My guess is Question1 -> a) and Question2 -> e)
ACE model = ACE10-6500-K9
Version = A2(3.3)
Any help on this issue would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Nilesh
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Application Networking
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-27-2011 05:41 AM
Hi Nilesh,
The decision was taken by BU that if the servers which has static sticky entries point to fails, and therefore are not reachable, the static sticky entries will not be bypassed and connections are continuously sent to the 'out-of-service' servers.
If you need redundancy with static sticky entries, then you should use backup real server within a servefarm:
Best regards,
Ahmad
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2011 07:17 PM
Hi Nilesh,
I have done more tests in my lab regarding this issue, and I found my information was wrong
Please refer to the following document which should cover all scenarios:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17765
Best regards,
Ahmad
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-27-2011 05:41 AM
Hi Nilesh,
The decision was taken by BU that if the servers which has static sticky entries point to fails, and therefore are not reachable, the static sticky entries will not be bypassed and connections are continuously sent to the 'out-of-service' servers.
If you need redundancy with static sticky entries, then you should use backup real server within a servefarm:
Best regards,
Ahmad
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2011 03:00 AM
Hi Ahmad,
thank you for your reply. One last question.
We can configure a resource-limit per context including that for sticky entries.
Is there limit or a way to limit the number of sticky entries per sticky table within an ACE context ?
Regards,
Nilesh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2011 03:32 AM
Hi Nilesh,
No, the only control level you have is per context bases, then the resource will be shared between all sticky groups/tables inside the context.
Best regards,
Ahmad
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-02-2011 07:17 PM
Hi Nilesh,
I have done more tests in my lab regarding this issue, and I found my information was wrong
Please refer to the following document which should cover all scenarios:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17765
Best regards,
Ahmad
