Content rule works with no redundant-vips configured

[michael.e.reid]

Hello,

We have a content rule configured (VIP address 10.1.2.3) but have not configured an ip redundant-vip 1 10.1.2.3 under the circuit configuration on either the master or backup CSS.

This content rule works though ? Why is this ?

cheers,

Mike

[Gilles Dufour]

both css are responding to arp request for this vip, but luckily the upstream router keeps using the csm mac/css.

I would still recommend to use the redundant-vip.

G.