I've built out a new VIP on one of my ACE contexts, but each time I try to apply either the policy-map to an interface, or the class-map to the policy-map, receive the same error:
Error: Cannot overlap vip or NAT or interface address configured in a shared interface
The odd part is there isn't a conflicting IP address anywhere on the context that I can find. Have a TAC case open, but my assigned engineer wasn't able to find a conflict either. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Here are the pertinent configurations (name's/IP's have been changed from actual):
probe http PROBE
port 80
interval 5
faildetect 12
passdetect interval 5
passdetect count 15
request method get url /server
expect status 200 200
header Host header-value "www.prd.com"
connection term forced
open 1
rserver host SERVER01
ip address 10.24.71.16
inservice
rserver host SERVER02
ip address 10.24.71.17
inservice
serverfarm host PRD_SF
predictor leastconns
probe PROBE
rserver SERVER01
inservice
rserver SERVER02
inservice
parameter-map type http HTTP_PARAMS
case-insensitive
persistence-rebalance
set header-maxparse-length 8192
length-exceed continue
parameter-map type connection CONN_PARAMS
set tcp mss min 536 max 1380
exceed-mss allow
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.0 address source PRD_SG
timeout 60
replicate sticky
serverfarm PRD_SF
class-map match-all PRD_VIP
2 match virtual-address 10.24.70.171 tcp eq www
class-map match-all PRD_HTTPS_VIP
2 match virtual-address 10.24.70.171 tcp eq https
policy-map type loadbalance first-match PRD_LB-PMAP
class class-default
sticky-serverfarm PRD_SG
policy-map multi-match PRD_PMAP
class PRD_VIP
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PRD_LB-PMAP
loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
class PRD_HTTPS_VIP
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PRD_LB-PMAP
loadbalance vip icmp-reply
appl-parameter http advanced-options HTTP_PARAMS
connection advanced-options CONN_PARAMS
interface vlan 70
service-policy input PRD_PMAP
