05-11-2005 08:10 PM
Hi,
I am wondering if it really significant if you put this command under the rules and services in an active/back-up setup.
Because, one of my peer is arguing that it makes more sense only in an active/active environment where it preserves the sessions but in an active/backup it happens by default and this command doesn't help the situation anyway. The app-session, VRRP will do this. True?
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-12-2005 04:10 AM
Failover is not statefull unless you configure ASR/ISC.
If you do have ASR/ISC you need redundant-index on the services and rules.
Without ASR/ISC the redundant-index is useless and after failover all your connections will be lost.
It does not matter if you are in Active/Standby or Active/Active mode.
More info at:
Regards,
Gilles.
05-12-2005 04:10 AM
Failover is not statefull unless you configure ASR/ISC.
If you do have ASR/ISC you need redundant-index on the services and rules.
Without ASR/ISC the redundant-index is useless and after failover all your connections will be lost.
It does not matter if you are in Active/Standby or Active/Active mode.
More info at:
Regards,
Gilles.
05-12-2005 03:58 PM
Gilles,
In my Active/Standby setup we already use the ISC/ASR on the GE ports.
So, you say the redundant-index is a must now to save the sessions.
Thanks Gilles!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide