Cisco Bug Discussions

Hi there, i dont really get the description of this issue , im going to upgrade from 9.1.5 to 9.1.7(29), and i have a 256 MB flash memory and 2G RAM, ASA 5540 , will this bug affect me? i also would like to know if the 9.1.7(29) compatible with ASDM ...

hi all,   having a challenge with CPU Utilisation  %DXMRVL_DRV_ERR-2-DXMRVL_DRV_INTER_ERR: DXMRVL driver Layer Internal Error: Could not remove entry from shadow table for port [63] Mac:0100.5e00.0118 on Vlan [1] for device [1  

Hi, The following is the response from cisco bug api where the highlighted part in the response   "product": "Cisco Catalyst 3560 Series Switches" shows only one product i.e.,  Cisco Catalyst 3560 Series Switches   { "id": "3", "base_...

Virtual ISE box affected ?  R-ISE-VM-K9=  Version 2.2.0.470 ?

As far as I can tell there is no fix for this.  The Security advisory tells me to look at he Bug ID and the Bug ID tells me to look at the Security Advisory.   Am I missing something?

Hello,   What does it mean "Device with default configuration" under the problem conditions? How can I verify this default configuration?   In addition, how can I determine if my product is vulnerable to this bug/advisory?   Thank you,

What an easy solution. But how can we install the license if we cannot boot the device.    I have this problem at the exact moment but the Nexus won't boot completely so I cannot install the license. 

HI Is this bug hits the ACI environment ? Is there any fix for it. I want to setup Microsoft NLB with ACI. Please confirm how i can go ahead.     

Hi, as anyone got any more information on this bug?  We encountered it and it caused a major outage on our infrastructure.  We contacted TAC and were told to upgrade.  Why is a Sev 3 and why didn't appear in the Release Notes?

Dear TAC, please provide an update on the ETA for the fixed release for Cisco FCM platform

I am still seeing this issue occur in Version 4.17

Does anyone know how to use a workaround to see what packets are hitting these ACE's ? I would like to confirm that the entries are being hit and confirm when packets are dropped.   Thanks!

This was also confirmed as an issue with 2.2.0.470 through a TAC case, but this bug page doesn't have that documented currently (2018-09-14). Will this bug page be updated, and is there any information on a release date for the 2.2 fix?

I just found this bug on s6t64-ipservicesk9_npe-mz.SPA.155-1.SY.bin    026931: Sep 14 07:52:07.247 UTC: %EARL-SW2_DFC1-3-NF_PARITY_ERROR: EARL 0 NF ASIC: Uncorrectable Parity error in Netflow Table.026932: Sep 14 07:52:08.155 UTC: %EARL-SW2_DFC1-1-EX...