07-16-2018 07:11 AM - edited 03-20-2019 10:18 PM
Having the same issue here on 3.2.
Manual APIC-EM sync job yields "partial success" result instead of "success".
I once tested creating PnP instance in prime without defining configuration template for a device, including only bootstrap template. Automatic APIC-EM synchronization looked the same (missing config file) as it does now. However, the manual sync job yielded a "success" result.
This leads me to think that there is a problem with assigning the configuration file, created from the template, to the PnP instance that is synchronized right after the creation (assuming the synchronization itself works as expected).
Does anybody have any suggestions as to where to look for evidence of this claim?
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-16-2018 07:22 AM
UPDATE:
After creating a profile instance, entering the exact state mentioned in the bug, I selected the particular instance in Prime and selected "edit". I proceeded to instance summary without modifying any options or values and clicked "Finish".
Configuration file was synchronized with APIC-EM automatically.
However, this requires a manual intervention via web gui and is therefore not a fix/workaround, rather a semi-workaround as it destroys the purpose of a complete automation via Rest-API.
07-16-2018 07:22 AM
UPDATE:
After creating a profile instance, entering the exact state mentioned in the bug, I selected the particular instance in Prime and selected "edit". I proceeded to instance summary without modifying any options or values and clicked "Finish".
Configuration file was synchronized with APIC-EM automatically.
However, this requires a manual intervention via web gui and is therefore not a fix/workaround, rather a semi-workaround as it destroys the purpose of a complete automation via Rest-API.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide