Update Line Call Forwarding All with only Pattern?

[cdnadmin]

This document was generated from CDN thread

Created by: Alessandro Marra on 19-08-2013 09:57:30 AM
Hello,

in the example on this URL: http://developer.cisco.com/downloads/axl/cookbook/updateLine.html

I can find this information:
Step 1: Update the line with required information.
The <pattern> is the only required field that indicating the DN you are trying to set or clear a callForwardAll phone number from.
•To update the phone number, enter the new number in the <destination>
•To clear the phone number, just leave the <destination> elements empty
That means that the only required field to set or remove a call forward is the DN Number.

But if I try this php code it not works:

$callForwardAll = array("destination"=>$destination);
$response = $client->updateLine(array("pattern"=>$pattern,"callForwardAll"=>$callForwardAll));

Why? Anyone has an Idea of my error? It’s an example error on the cookbook site? I have an CUCM 8.6

If instead I try with the Route Partition Name, it works fine:

$callForwardAll = array("destination"=>$destination);
$response = $client->updateLine(array("pattern"=>$pattern,"routePartitionName"=>$routePartitionName,"callForwardAll"=>$callForwardAll));

Thx & Regards

Alessandro

Subject: RE: Update Line Call Forwarding All with only Pattern?
Replied by: David Staudt on 19-08-2013 01:39:11 PM
A line is properly uniquely identified by either its UUID (pkid) or its Pattern/DN+RoutePartition.  Note it is possible for multiple lines to have the same DN, but different RoutePartition, so it will be best practice to always specify the RoutePartition in such requests.
I would suspect either your line has multiple appearances in different partitions, causing request to fail, or perhaps Pattern+RoutePartition is being enforced in your AXL version.  Likely the Cookbook example could use some enhancement to make this points clearer.

Subject: RE: Update Line Call Forwarding All with only Pattern?
Replied by: Alessandro Marra on 26-08-2013 04:34:03 AM
Hi David
 
Thx for you feedback, I will make it with the DN+RoutePartition.
 
Regards
Alessandro