cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1947
Views
0
Helpful
8
Replies

UCCX script not answering the call

ImTheGame56
Level 1
Level 1

Hi All,

My first post but I'm coming across a strange problem and i guess i just need a second set of eyes to steer me in the proper direction.

Here is the scenario:

I have a working script where i call the trigger and it answers (ie...reactive debug is able to step through) - this is a test Call Control Group so its separate from the production environment. This proves the trigger and script are working correctly enough for the debug to step through

When i change the script and click update - I call the script and I get "i'm sorry we are currently experiencing system problems and are unable to process your call". Its using the same trigger, so I would expect that I would at least be able to step through the script (even if the script is not correct). However, when i call it I get that message and the reactive debug just times out.

Any thoughts?

8 Replies 8

seanvaid
Level 3
Level 3

So are you saying this is a new script that was working in a test environment, but failing when implementing in production?

No, it was failing in a test environment. 

But I believe i found the problem.  I had a subscript (holiday script) in the script that was non-existence in UCCX so thats why it was failing.

Makes sense.

The error message you're hearing is due to the main script trying to trigger the subscript.

Its just weird because the subscript is lower down on the logic of the script and when i called the trigger it wouldn't even hit the reactive debug

That is weird. You might have issues with the trigger / ccg / cucm.

Let me know if deleting the subscript does it, I'm very curious. 

Deleting the subscript did work.

I was able to see the reactive debug fire up and step through the process. 

Such a weird error

Interesting. I guess the main script triggers the subscript right away, without ever even reaching the step..

Regardless, glad to hear it's fixed. 

Thanks for responding!