12-12-2016 04:55 AM - edited 03-01-2019 04:34 AM
So during project creation there is an option to enter a TFTP server and path.
Under what circumstances is that option used?
In our Proof of Concept we've just been using the APIC-EM VM for both image and configuration storage and distribution and that is working very well. If I understand the underlying architecture of the APIC-EM to scale up, say we were provisioning 50 devices at a time, as more resources are needed the platform can spin up more LXCs/Containers so why would we not take advantage of that (vs a separate TFTP server?)
Thanks!
Tftp server address | Tftp server Path |
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-12-2016 08:37 AM
The other use case is when your APIC-EM controller and device are across geographies and the connectivity between them might be slow. Having a local TFTP server could help speed up the image provisioning process.
12-12-2016 05:28 AM
Hey Claudia,
No other reason than what is in the Configuration Guide for 3.1.
"When you do not have the option to download the configuration and the image file from the Cisco APIC-EM server, you can deploy the configuration and Cisco device Image file from an external TFTP."
Nick
12-12-2016 06:23 AM
Thanks Nick,
Can you share any examples of the use cases for which that was intended? I'm trying to wrap my head around why you could not use the controller?
is it something like, Security has said that images will only come from *this* authorized TFTP server, etc...
12-12-2016 08:37 AM
The other use case is when your APIC-EM controller and device are across geographies and the connectivity between them might be slow. Having a local TFTP server could help speed up the image provisioning process.
12-12-2016 08:40 AM
Sairam, Thank you...that is just the type of use case i was looking for to better understand this capability!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide