cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
150
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

VXLAN ESI NON ZERO

Ratheesh mv
Level 1
Level 1

Ratheeshmv_0-1738136355467.png

Virtual image = 9000v
NXOS image file is: bootflash:///nxos.9.2.4.bin

 

User-1 generated G-ARP and directly installed it on LEAF 2. In the next phase LEAF 2 generated MAC-IP route (10.10.10.10 - IP
5000.0003.0007-MAC & ESI= Non zero). This route has been learned on LEAF 1.
LEAF - 1 re-originated the same route with site of origin field and advertised it.

is it expected behavior in the ES scenario ?

Outputs

------

LEAF-1# sh ip arp vrf test-10 | begin Address

Address Age MAC Address Interface Flags
10.10.10.10 00:02:29 5000.0003.0007 Vlan10 PS RO

LEAF-2# sh ip arp vrf test-10 | begin Address
Address Age MAC Address Interface Flags
10.10.10.10 00:03:42 5000.0003.0007 Vlan10

LEAF-3# show bgp l2vpn evpn 10.10.10.10
BGP routing table information for VRF default, address family L2VPN EVPN
Route Distinguisher: 1.1.1.1:32777
BGP routing table entry for [2]:[0]:[0]:[48]:[5000.0003.0007]:[32]:[10.10.10.10]
/248, version 717
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Flags: (0x000202) (high32 00000000) on xmit-list, is not in l2rib/evpn, is not i
n HW

Advertised path-id 1
Path type: internal, path is valid, is best path, no labeled nexthop
Imported to 1 destination(s)
AS-Path: NONE, path sourced internal to AS
11.11.11.11 (metric 41) from 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1)
Origin IGP, MED not set, localpref 100, weight 0
Received label 10100
Extcommunity: RT:65501:10100 SOO:1.1.1.1:256 ENCAP:8
ESI: 0301.0203.0405.0600.0007

Path-id 1 not advertised to any peer

Route Distinguisher: 2.2.2.2:32777
BGP routing table entry for [2]:[0]:[0]:[48]:[5000.0003.0007]:[32]:[10.10.10.10]
/248, version 703
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Flags: (0x000202) (high32 00000000) on xmit-list, is not in l2rib/evpn, is not i
n HW

Advertised path-id 1
Path type: internal, path is valid, is best path, no labeled nexthop
Imported to 1 destination(s)
AS-Path: NONE, path sourced internal to AS
22.22.22.22 (metric 41) from 2.2.2.2 (2.2.2.2)
Origin IGP, MED not set, localpref 100, weight 0
Received label 10100
Extcommunity: RT:65501:10100 ENCAP:8
ESI: 0301.0203.0405.0600.0007

Path-id 1 not advertised to any peer

Route Distinguisher: 3.3.3.3:32777 (L2VNI 10100)
BGP routing table entry for [2]:[0]:[0]:[48]:[5000.0003.0007]:[32]:[10.10.10.10]
/248, version 718
Paths: (2 available, best #1)
Flags: (0x000212) (high32 00000000) on xmit-list, is in l2rib/evpn, is not in HW

Advertised path-id 1
Path type: internal, path is valid, is best path, no labeled nexthop, in rib
Imported from 1.1.1.1:32777:[2]:[0]:[0]:[48]:[5000.0003.0007]:[32]:
[10.10.10.10]/248
AS-Path: NONE, path sourced internal to AS
11.11.11.11 (metric 41) from 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1)
Origin IGP, MED not set, localpref 100, weight 0
Received label 10100
Extcommunity: RT:65501:10100 SOO:1.1.1.1:256 ENCAP:8
ESI: 0301.0203.0405.0600.0007

Path type: internal, path is valid, not best reason: Router Id, no labeled nex
thop
Imported from 2.2.2.2:32777:[2]:[0]:[0]:[48]:[5000.0003.0007]:[32]:
[10.10.10.10]/248
AS-Path: NONE, path sourced internal to AS
22.22.22.22 (metric 41) from 2.2.2.2 (2.2.2.2)
Origin IGP, MED not set, localpref 100, weight 0
Received label 10100
Extcommunity: RT:65501:10100 ENCAP:8
ESI: 0301.0203.0405.0600.0007

Path-id 1 not advertised to any peer

 

 

 

1 Reply 1

AshSe
VIP
VIP

Hey @Ratheesh mv 

is it expected behavior in the ES scenario ?


The described behavior is expected in an Ethernet Segment (ES) scenario. The re-origination of the route with the SOO (Site of Origin) attribute, the BGP EVPN route selection process, and the ARP table consistency all align with the expected behavior in a multi-homed EVPN deployment.

 

Hope This Helps!!!

AshSe

Forum Tips: 

  1. Insert photos/images inline - don't attach.
  2. Always mark helpful and correct answers, it helps others find what they need.
  3. For a prompt reply, kindly tag @name. An email will be automatically sent to the member.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card