10-03-2017 02:19 PM - edited 03-17-2019 11:17 AM
Hello,
So ran into a problem that I haven't seen before. First I was trying to figure out why a transcoder was being used for these calls. Since both were using 711ulaw between the regions. Finally after going through traces I see this is the reason.
10-03-2017 09:03 PM
Hi there,
Interesting issue indeed. A few questions:
There is no other area that I am aware of (other than the parameter you mentioned) where you can adjust the ptime of CUCM registered endpoint calls. Additionally I have never heard such a thing as a 60ms ptime on G711u which is what I think "(Cap,ptime)= (4,60)" is implying support for.
It would be helpful if you could attach a full CM trace for the test call, along with the calling and called number.
10-04-2017 10:01 AM
Hello thanks for taking a look. It is unusual I have never seen a different ptime coming from cucm either.
1) The call flow is this. CVP--sip--CUCM--sip--LCP--sip--ICT--ip phone. So the devices this is happening between the regions are LCP and sip trunk. Now I was thinking maybe the packetization is different on the CUCM on the other side of the trunk. But you'll see from traces the caps mismatch comes even before the invite is even sent to the trunk.
2)described above with regards to endpoints.
3)the regions this is occurring to are between A=regMTP B=regCoimbatore. Attaching screenshot of codec preference list between the two. Yes it is different but only in that 711 is first.
4)yes
Not sure how to upload traces it won't allow me to upload .rar or .zip. And would be silly if having to upload all the sdl files.
10-04-2017 04:50 PM - edited 10-04-2017 04:53 PM
10-05-2017 10:09 AM
Yeah no idea why they did that. But that is good idea let me try it.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide